The argument in favor of US economic aid to other nations is invalid because the premises do not relate to the conclusion.
An argument is valid when all the premises are true and build a true conclusion.
According to the above, the argument presented has the following premises:
- Foreign economic aid to other countries is a good investment for the United States.
- It comprises only one percent of the entire federal budget, about $ 20 billion.
And the conclusion it presents is:
- Returns untold amounts in increased sales of American goods and services.
According to the above, the argument is a fallacy because the premises are not related to the conclusion because:
An investment is an economic contribution to receive a later profit, in this case, the United States is investing, and those who are receiving the profit are private US companies. Furthermore, no argument is presented that relates the increase in sales of goods and services with this investment.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/2645376
He’s saying the role of president makes that person a better person and makes them have more responsibility then before but no matter how prepared people thought they were they could not possibly be ready to become president.
Answer:
The southern region
Explanation:
The most famous secession movement was the case of the Southern states of the United States.
Answer:
The Oslo process started after secret negotiations in Oslo, resulting in the recognition by the PLO of the State of Israel and the recognition by Israel of the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people and as a partner in negotiations, it's efforts for peace was just not implemented.
I hope this helps
Answer:
The Progressive Party
The Progressive Party (often referred to as the "Bull Moose Party")
