In general terms, most human beings are committed to obeying the law. However, to give a well-founded answer it's important to take into consideration the concepts of <em>ethics </em>and <em>morality</em> and also the cultures involved in this matter. Having said that, in the dilemma of a person being forced to choose between breaking the law to help a friend or not breaking the law but disappointing a friend, the results I would expect are the following:
The Hindu population (adults and children), based on the complex and inherent concept of <em>Dharma, </em>which assigns a high value to right conduct, ethics and morality, would tend to prioritise the obedience to law while the group of Americans would probably hesitate in this forced decision. Some psychology specialists talk about a moral crisis in America in which the limits of moral conviction, virtues and vices, good and evil, right and wrong are not very clear. If this applies to a vast part of American society, they would not be expected to choose law obedience in first place.
Answer: First Give God His Share, Give The Poor And Maybe What I really need I’ll spend for and save the rest of it
Explanation:
Answer:
The legalization of marijuana is the act of making marijuana (the drug Cannabis) legal
I wouldn't take my word on this but i THINK the answer is D
The profits of domestic financial corporations are always distributed.
Corporate profits are the excess revenue received by corporations over their accounting cost of production.
<em>One portion of the profits</em> is used to pay corporate profits taxes. These taxes are paid to the government.
<em>The second portion</em> is used by the corporations to finance capital investment. This portion is also called retained earnings. These are profits not paid as taxes nor as dividends to shareholders.
<em>The third portion </em>is used to pay out dividends to shareholders or corporate owners.
Each portion of the profits may change with the ebb and flow of economic conditions and tax laws.