What was the treaty of Versailles

History

2 answers:

babunello [35]3 years ago

8 0

I hope this helps

the treaty of Versailles (French: traité de Versailles) was the most important of the peace treaties that brought world war l to an end. the treaty ended the state of war between Germany and the allied powers. the other central powers on the German side of world war l signed separate treaties

IrinaVladis [17]3 years ago

3 0

The Treaty of Versailles consisted in a negotiation agreement to put on high the fire caused by the First World War. This treaty was legitimized on June 28, 1919. In that treaty, Germany had to accept its responsibility for the beginning of that war. A proposal was also made to compensate the victims of the war and achieve military disarmament by this country.

You might be interested in

Clement Vallandigham was: a. the Union general who turned back a Confederate invasion at Gettysburg. b. the Confederate general

Radda [10]

Answer:

Option: d. a northern politician banished to the Confederacy.

Explanation:

Clement Vallandigham was a politician during the Civil War in America. He was born in Ohio in 29, July 1820. Vallandigham became a leader of the Copperhead known as anti-war Democrats. He gave his opinion against war to settle the differences between the South and the North. He was later banished to Confederacy by President Abraham Lincoln.

4 0

3 years ago

How did the “putting out” system work?

nalin [4]

The putting out system was a precursor to the factories of the industrial revolution. It was an intermediate step that came between the system in which everything was made at home and the system in which everything was made in factories.

6 0

3 years ago

The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk ended the fighting between Russia and:

8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

Germany. The war is over between them. Russia was already in a civil war.

6 0

3 years ago

What is Zinn's approach to the study of history? What does he suggest occurs when history is told as a story of human progress?

alina1380 [7]

Zinn said that study of history should be done from the point of view of the common man. It should not be done from the point of view of the historians or the politicians.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Zinn thought that the way we study history is very boring and that we have been bent under the heavy weight of the history books which lean up on us. They have set from the point of view of the historians and the politicians. This makes it very boring for us to read this subject.

History should rather be studied from the point of view of the common man so that they can understand it better because through this way they can related to it in a better way. When it is told in the form of a story, the interest of the people increases.

5 0

3 years ago

Is Libel supported by freedom of speech?

EleoNora [17]

If it is written down, it's called "libel" whereas if it's spoken, it's called "slander." Defamation law attempts to balance the freedom of speech and open exchange of ideas without giving someone permission to run around spreading lies about another that may harm his or her reputation, ability to earn a living, etc.

<em>Hope this helps you!</em>

Have a great day!

<h3>:3 -~- <u>WolfieWolfFromSketch</u> -~- :3</h3>

6 0

3 years ago