The first answer is correct since you are only supposed to put information that clarifies the sentence in parentheses. Only putting dinner in parentheses wouldn’t make sense since it is a crucial part of the sentence, nor would you only put 6:30pm in parentheses since you already have about outside of the parentheses so saying As soon as we had finished dinner it was about, I started my homework.,Doesn’t make sense that means that even if you put things in parentheses the sentence should still make sense if the parentheses aren’t there.
I hope this makes sense if not please comment and I can try to explain it better :)
These two characters are not similar whatsoever. Eurymachus is a deceitful person, always scheming, thinking of plans how to enjoy himself and doesn't care about others. He even wanted to kill Odysseus' son Telemachus. He treats everyone with disrespect and is extremely arrogant. These are not adjectives that describe Odysseus, even though he did show arrogance when defeating the Cyclops.
I'm pretty sure it is <span>A) He is attempting to directly involve listeners and motivate them in his causes.</span>
Answer:
The following are the grounds upon which one can interpret the character of Griselda as a morally ambiguous:
1. The explicit meanings of her responses to Gualtieri.
2. Her failure to act out gender stereotypes of behavior upon learning about the loss of her children.
Explanation:
The above are the correct answer to the question on the character of Griselda as a morally ambiguous woman.
