1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zaharov [31]
3 years ago
7

When Bill Clinton reelected president in 1996, he had worked harder than ever to improve the economy. That will be one of his to

p priorities.
Which of the following best describes the verbs in the passage?
inconsistentconsistentpresent tensefuture tense
History
2 answers:
mr_godi [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Inconsistent.

The verbs that are used in this passage are in the wrong tense. They are also inconsistent with each other (they do not match). The passage is describing events that happened in 1996. Therefore, the verbs should reflect this by being in the past tense.

Veseljchak [2.6K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer

A) inconsistent

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which best explains how voter participation had changed by the election of 1828?
Oksana_A [137]
More working-class people had gained the right to vote, and voter participation sharply increased." Twice as many voters cast ballots in the election of 1828 as in 1824, four times as many as in 1820
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence contains coordinate adjectives that should be separated by commas?(1 point)
Alika [10]

Answer:

B or C

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
This engraving shows people removing artwork, sculpture, and other decorations from a church.
Aloiza [94]

Answer: the practice is called (iconoclasm). The church shown was most likely built by the (Catholic Church). The artwork is being removed because the people thought it was (a sin to display it in a church).

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
All of the following are true of the Dred Scott v. Sandford except A. Scott could only sue in state courts. B. living in a free
vlada-n [284]
The answer that is not true is A:  "Scott could only sue in state courts."

Whether Dred Scott, as a slave, had any legal right to sue in court was a matter that applied whether talking about state or federal courts.  When Scott's suit was rejected by a state of Missouri court, Scott and his supporters managed to bring the case into a federal court, and it went all the way to the Supreme Court.  Though the Supreme Court at the time ruled that Scott had no right to bring the suit because he was a slave and not a citizen (point D above), the case gave Chief Justice Roger Taney opportunity to make further statements regarding the slavery issue, including points B and C in your list above.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help crown if you do
Lapatulllka [165]
2° and last one thats an exam?
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The training of animals to work for humans or to serve as pets is called ______.
    5·2 answers
  • How was North Carolina and South Carolina formed?​
    10·2 answers
  • What was president Polk attitude toward the idea of manifest
    10·1 answer
  • The name of the court with final authority on the constitution
    15·1 answer
  • Why did galileo agree or comply with the church beliefs for a while
    7·1 answer
  • 5 skills and abilities that ceasar did for people in rome
    6·1 answer
  • What are two important events that shaped the election of 1800?
    13·2 answers
  • How has globalization made countries more interdependent? Choose FIVE answers.
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! for brainliest!!
    12·1 answer
  • How did Christianity influence the Declaration of Independence?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!