Answer:
$1,524 underapplied
Explanation:
Predetermined overhead rate = Estimated Manufacturing Overhead ÷ Estimated Activity.
= $560,324 ÷ 22,060
= $25.40
Applied Overheads = Predetermined overhead rate × Actual Activity
= $25.40 × 22,000
= $558,800
<em>Where,</em>
Actual Overheads are $560,324 (given)
<em>Conditions :</em>
If Actual Overheads > Applied Overheads, we say overheads are under-applied and if Actual Overheads < Applied Overheads, we say that overheads are over-applied.
<em>Therefore ,</em>
In our case, Actual Overheads : $560,324 > Applied Overheads : $558,800. Overheads have been under-applied by $1,524 ($560,324 - $558,800).
Answer:
Cash flow= $64,847
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Sellin price= $72,376
Tax rate= 25%
Book value= $43,070
<u>First, we need to calculate the gain from the sale and the tax:</u>
Gain= 72,376 - 43,070= $29,036
Tax= gain*tax rate
Tax= 29,036*0.25= $7,259
<u>Now, we can calculate the after-tax cash flow:</u>
<u></u>
Gain= 29,036
Tax= (7,259)
Book value= 43,070
Cash flow= $64,847
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer: $1,750
Explanation:
Incurring a health insurance cost of $5,000 or increasing salaries by $5,000 will have the same effect on the taxes because they will both be removed from the income before the taxes are calculated.
The reduction in tax in either case is:
= Expense * Tax rate
= 5,000 * 35%
= $1,750
He was supposed to keep 10%.
The 10% share was one of the columbus demand' when both columbus and the crown agreed to the terms for his voyage fundinsg.
But, since <span>he had been relieved of his duties as governor, the Crown no longer feel obligated to honour the term of the contract.</span>
