B and C both seem like irrelevant choices to me. choice A definitely relates to the excerpt, because the main idea of it is that ethiopians should be given "a respect agreeable" and choice A describes that idea. however, in the case of choice B, the excerpt says that ethiopians are the children of adam and eve, but that doesn't necessarily suggest that ethiopians and africans are from the same location. i think B is too literal of an interpretation, personally. C also seems irrelevant, because the excerpt doesn't mention the concept of love and it doesn't state that we should love them--it says that they should be treated with respect, and for me, there is a distinction there. i would say that D is correct, because it states that ethiopians are "the offspring of god" which emphasizes that they, alongside others, are children of god.
i don't know if you're allowed to pick multiple answers here or what, because i believe B and C are equally incorrect.
I'm gonna go with A. Inductive reasoning deals mostly with predictions and behavior. Specific examples are combined and used to make general assumptions.
Answer: The speaker's actions come from their father's teachings, despite their innocent instinct to be scared of the process of hunting.
Explanation: The poem describes how the speaker's father is teaching them to hunt. They go hunting for some pheasants, but despite how cruel and horrible it is for the speaker to see, the father justifies that hunting is not for fun, they're just taking what God provides to them.
As the poem goes, you can see that the speaker is learning from their father's actions, pointing at the mother with a water gun because that's the way you hunt. The speaker's feelings of fear and guilt may dissolve because a kid learns from what surrounds them.
The word that does not belong is: "usually".
______________________________________
Answer:
i think the answer you chose is correct
Explanation:
