1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
poizon [28]
3 years ago
8

Before the Europeans occupied central Mexico, they were the indigenous residents.

History
1 answer:
Paraphin [41]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is the Aztecs(C)

You might be interested in
Courts decide points of law, not points of fact.
lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

the supreme courts decide points of law, some cases that prove this are

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Established supremacy of the U.S. Constitution and federal laws over state laws

United States v. Lopez (1995) Congress may not use the commerce clause to make possession of a gun in a school zone a

federal crime

LOR-2: Provisions of the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights are continually being interpreted to balance the power of government

and the civil liberties of individuals.

Engel v. Vitale (1962) School sponsorship of religious activities violates the establishment clause

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) Compelling Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade violates the free exercise clause

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) Public school students have the right to wear black

armbands in school to protest the Vietnam War

New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) Bolstered the freedom of the press, establishing a “heavy presumption against

prior restraint” even in cases involving national security

Schenck v. United States (1919) Speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected by the First Amendment

LOR-3: Protections of the Bill of Rights have been selectively incorporated by way of the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process

clause to prevent state infringement of basic liberties.

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Guaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent in a state felony case

Roe v. Wade (1973) Extended the right of privacy to a woman’s decision to have an abortion

McDonald v. Chicago (2010) The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is applicable to the states

PRD-1: The 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause as well as other constitutional provisions have often been used to

support the advancement of equality.

Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Race-based school segregation violates the equal protection clause PRD-2: The impact of

federal policies on campaigning and electoral rules continues to be contested by both sides of the political spectrum.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) Political spending by corporations, associations, and labor unions is a

form of protected speech under the First Amendment CON-3: The republican ideal in the U.S. is manifested in the structure

and operation of the legislative branch.

Baker v. Carr (1961) Opened the door to equal protection challenges to redistricting and the development of the “one person,

one vote” doctrine by ruling that challenges to redistricting did not raise “political questions” that would keep federal courts

from reviewing such challenges

Shaw v. Reno (1993) Majority minority districts, created under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, may be constitutionally

challenged by voters if race is the only factor used in creating the district CON-5: The design of the judicial branch protects the

Supreme Court’s independence as a branch of government, and the emergence and use of judicial review remains a powerful

judicial practice.

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the principle of judicial review empowering the Supreme Court to nullify an act of the

legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution

4 0
3 years ago
Which natural resources helped the kingdoms of Mali and Ghana become powerful trading empires?​
Xelga [282]

Answer:

salt and gold i think

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which one of the following is a foreign policy aimed at controlling foreign trade by holding colonies and defending them against
kari74 [83]

Foreign policy that is aimed  aimed at controlling foreign trade by holding colonies and defending them against other foreign powers is: imperialism

Imperialism refers to the view that a country should dominate others in a certain way in order increase its power. Controlling foreign trades by holding colonies is a form of political and economical domination that was popular among Empires in Europe.

3 0
3 years ago
When Hitler sent troops into the Rhineland in 1936 and Austria in 1938, other European nations responded with immediate armed re
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

offered no resistance is the correct answer.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Can someone help me with this history lesson question
Salsk061 [2.6K]
Either A or D bc on this article thing it says “Government forced them to leave their homelands and walk hundreds of miles too late especially Designated “Indian territory”.” but it also says after that “across the Mississippi river”
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who imprisons the princess in the first prince of persia?
    13·1 answer
  • Which phrase describes vodu
    9·1 answer
  • What best expresses Southerners' views of Northerners?
    7·1 answer
  • In 1933, the Nazi government used the Hereditary Health Court to __________. A. start a government eugenics program B. end the g
    7·2 answers
  • 2
    12·1 answer
  • Research and write a short report explaining why advances in communication were important during a time of industrialization and
    12·1 answer
  • Did Columbus leave home? If did why?
    7·2 answers
  • WlLL GIVE 20 POINTS PLEASE HELP ASAP!! :))
    12·1 answer
  • . Don, Ron and Con earned $300. Don is to
    15·1 answer
  • Who was Lord Mountbetten?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!