Answer:
there would be 2 advantages/pros and a lot of disadvantages/cons
Explanation:
if everyone thought thinks the same it would probably be easier to get through lessons and such and if you don't think that way, at least you are smarter than them. disadvantages would be that most think only one way/black and white and 5hibgs can only be a certain way
Answer:
The correct answer is A) they were evicted from the island, C) they were depicted as inferior and in need of help, and E) some of them were institutionalized.
Explanation:
The sentences that explain what happened to the people in Malaga Island, in Maine are: they were evicted from the island, they were depicted as inferior and in need of help, and some of them were institutionalized.
Malaga Island was a fishing village at the end of the 19th-century, beginning of the 20th-century. People used to live there without being married. People from Maine did not like the way those people lived. They asked them to leave the island. People form Malaga Island were perceived as fools, with feeble genes. Rumors said they even practiced barbaric conducts such as incest. That is why the sentences that explain what happened to the people in Malaga Island, in Maine are: they were evicted from the island, they were depicted as inferior and in need of help, and some of them were institutionalized.
Commons
“How did Faulkner pull it off?” is a question many a fledgling writer has asked themselves while struggling through a period of apprenticeship like that novelist John Barth describes in his 1999 talk "My Faulkner." Barth “reorchestrated” his literary heroes, he says, “in search of my writerly self... downloading my innumerable predecessors as only an insatiable green apprentice can.” Surely a great many writers can relate when Barth says, “it was Faulkner at his most involuted and incantatory who most enchanted me.” For many a writer, the Faulknerian sentence is an irresistible labyrinth. His syntax has a way of weaving itself into the unconscious, emerging as fair to middling imitation.
While studying at Johns Hopkins University, Barth found himself writing about his native Eastern Shore Maryland in a pastiche style of “middle Faulkner and late Joyce.” He may have won some praise from a visiting young William Styron, “but the finished opus didn’t fly—for one thing, because Faulkner intimately knew his Snopses and Compsons and Sartorises, as I did not know my made-up denizens of the Maryland marsh.” The advice to write only what you know may not be worth much as a universal commandment. But studying the way that Faulkner wrote when he turned to the subjects he knew best provides an object lesson on how powerful a literary resource intimacy can be