The practice of paying back money to large companies who funded the railroad (assuming you meant railroad).
Answer:
We can list as similarities between these two empires their location, the way how they built their cities, and the period they build their empires. The differences, however, are more visible. For the differences, we can separate into two points: the government and the war practices.
Explanation:
The Babylonians were harsh with their laws. An example of this point is the Code of Hammurabi. Dated from around the year 1700 BC, this law agreement was based on the lex talionis, or "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth". The violence of these laws is one of the main differences between Babylonians and Hittites.
The Hittites Law Code was more complex and consistent. This is because of their nomadism, and especially because they had the precept to capture their enemies. So, their laws must be range. We can name their laws based on the concept of causes, which means, your actions would be punished according to their strength. However, there was no death penalty (capital punishment), and many of the crimes were solved trough tax payments or fines.
When it comes to war, the Babylonians were not used to combat. Even if they had an army and the pretense idea of expansion, they were closer to the research and scholar world. Many astronomical discoveries were proceeded by the Babylonians. On the other hand, Hittites were warriors.
Answer:
C - Hinduism began as the religion of the Aryans in the Indus River valley.
Where are the conclusions. They thought everything was from the gods above and karma was the gods paying them back
Answer:
Progressives usually aim for equality and social justice, thus, they should focus on policies that advance these goals.
Explanation:
Some of these policies could be: universal health care coverage, whether under a public system, or a mixed private/public system.
More funds for education, both in elementary, secondary, and tertiary education, making emphasis on those students who are talented but do not have enough economic resources to pay tuition.
Antoher policy could be aim at the treatment of minorities, who often bear the brunt of systemic inequalities.
