1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hodyreva [135]
3 years ago
9

Step Two: Your teacher has told you that: The fall of the Roman Empire was not due to one event but due to many events combined.

Write a paragraph of five to eight sentences in which you explain what your teacher means by this statement. You must provide at least five well-developed examples, organize your response carefully, and check for accurate spelling and grammar.
History
2 answers:
alina1380 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

There are many reasons for the fall of the roman empire. One reason is government corruption, the size of Rome alone made it hard to control Rome. It also lost all of its tradition and value to the sudden growth in Christianity. Barbarian tribes were also a problem, because this was about the time the Huns became a threat to nearby countries. Rome was eventually overthrown by a German barbaric leader, meaning that Rome's rule had officially come to an end.

victus00 [196]3 years ago
3 0
<span>There wasn't a single thing that brought Rome to its knees, but instead a dastardly combination of several factors. At the source of everything, the Roman government was incredibly corrupt and ineffective, and Roman citizens did not trust in the leaders of the Republic. In addition, the rise of Christianity and the shying away from the Roman polytheistic religious traditions also contributed, as the latter viewed the emperor as having deistic authority. Finally, because of the sheer size of the Empire, it was incredibly hard to govern on the fringes and the Roman Empire spent too much money bolstering its military might.</span>
You might be interested in
Match the vocabulary word with its meaning. 1.Bolshevik a member of the left-wing majority group of the Russian Social Democrati
pishuonlain [190]
1. Bolshevik: the Bolshevik are the majority group of the Russian Social Democratic Party. They were named as such because they won most of the vital issues in the Second Party Congress. The group was founded and headed by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov.

2. Bourgeoisie: they are the people making up the middle class. They are the people living in cities and in affluence, as opposed to the proletariat. They have the rights to citizenship as well as politics. The bourgeoisie are the working force of the capitalists, and are tasked to work to maintain the capitalists' reign in the market.  

3. Czar: A czar is a male monarch or emperor of Russia before 1917. The word is taken from the Russian term for "ruler/emperor". Nowadays, the title is used to refer to high-level officials who are capable of organizing and running governmental departments . 

4. Menshavik: are the members of the liberal minority group of the Russian Social Democratic Party. The group is lead by Julius Matov and were the enemy faction of the Bolshevik in the Second Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party.  

5. Proletariat: the proletariat are the poorest class of working people in the society. The only value of the proletariat lies in their ability to work for others. According to the Marxist theory, the proletariat do not own the means of production and they only serve as the labor power. 
6 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
Explain about the use of exploration and discoveries for Europe???​
alexandr1967 [171]

Several factors came together. Europe had a population that was on average richer than most other cultures. A very competitive commercial class, ships that were superior than other cultures, developed for the rough North Atlantic, and a number of competitive states rather than a single empire.

5 0
2 years ago
In what ways was the advent of the arch an important milestone for Roman technology?
Umnica [9.8K]
Sbsbsbshgsgdgdjdjskksjdfgdgxz
8 0
3 years ago
What guarded the pyramids?<br><br> - slaves <br> - soldiers <br> - sphinx <br> - moats
Naddik [55]
The Sphinx guarded the pyramids due to the beliefs of the Egyptians.
<span />
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many geographical regions are in Mexico?<br> 2<br> 3<br> 4<br> 5
    9·2 answers
  • Which contributed to Americans’ sense of nationalism following the War of 1812?
    7·1 answer
  • The voting age as changed from 21 to 18 with the passing of which
    7·2 answers
  • What is an effigy? please help
    15·2 answers
  • what social scientist primarily study the scarcity of resources and the distribution of goods and services
    11·1 answer
  • In what ways did magna carta support the rise of representative government in england
    5·2 answers
  • What could America be like today if the French and Indian War would have turned out differently?
    13·1 answer
  • What conference split Germany and its capital Berlin into four parts and nations controlled each of the parts? *
    14·2 answers
  • How could monopolies impact the economy at large?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following events did NOT lead to Texas becoming its own province?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!