Answer:
Correct option is (B)
Explanation:
Given:
Principal amount = $15,000
Interest rate = 9% or 0.09
Maturity = 3 years
Every year Mandy Services make payment of $5,000 of principal amount and interest accrued in the previous year. In 2019, Interest accrued for 2018 would be:
Interest = Principal × rate × time
= 15,000 × 0.09 × 1
= $1,350
Total payment made by Mandy in 2019 = 5,000 + 1,350
= $6,350
Answer:
5.84%
Explanation:
We use the RATE function that is shown in the excel. Kindly find the attachment below:
The NPER shows the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $45
Future value or Face value = $47
PMT = $2
NPER = 3
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER,PMT,-PV,FV,type)
So, the annual compound rate of return is 5.84%
Answer:
Change in Net worth= $133.62
Explanation:
The two lease options require that the leasee ( the tenant) commit himself to pay a series of equal amount of rent installment at the different time period in the future.
These series of equal periodic cash flows occurring in the future are called annuities.
To have a meaningful comparison, the two annuities should be compared based on their present values. So we compute the present value of the two using the formula below:
Present Value (PV) =( A × (1- (1+r)^(-n))/r
Option 1:Current lease
PV = 500 × 1-(1+0.05)^(12)
= 500 × 8.863251636
= $4,431.62
Option 2: New Offer
This will be done in two steps:
PV of lease in year 3
PV =700 × (1-(1+0.05)^(-9))
= 700 × 7.107821676
=4,975.47
PV of lease in year 0
PV = FV × (1+r)^(-3)
=4,975.47 × 0.8638
=$4,298.00
My net worth would change by the amount of the difference between the two PV of the two annuities:
Difference in PV = $4,431.62-$4,298.00
Change in Net worth= $133.62
The appropriate response is Virtual Human Embryo. The general objective of the Virtual Human Embryo (VHE) venture is to expand comprehension of human embryology and to support the investigation of human embryonic improvement by furnishing understudies and analysts with dependable assets for human developing life morphology.
Answer:
These two statements are correct:
A. The level of private sector spending on real assets in Cassiopeia has traditionally been low.
If the economist Danny Cox is recommending increases in government investment in real assets, it must be because the private sector is not investing enough.
An economy with low levels of private investment is an economy that in the long-run will not grow because investing is what produces capital accumulation, and what faciliates technological change, and those two factors are the most important variables for economic growth.
E. Irrespective of what policy measure the government implements to combat the crisis, inflation in Cassiopeia is likely to increase further.
This statement is correct if it is referring to the two policies recommended by economist Cox and unionist Boyle. Niether an income tax refund, or an increase in government spending are measures that tackle inflation, and in fact, both could increase inflation.
A income tax refund would put more cash in the hands of the public, and if demand for money is low, this would increase the velocity of circulation, and the more rapidly money circulates, the higher the inflation rate according to the quantity theory of money.
And more government spending is a form of expansionary fiscal policy that could increase inflation if the government finances the expenses by printing money.
