There exist factors endogenous to all modern Arab monarchical regimes to which we can attribute their resilience in the face of the Arab Spring. The first and perhaps the most important of these in the context of the Arab Spring is that all of the eight monarchies existing today are able to foster a degree of legitimacy in their governance that presidents cannot attest to, deeming the overthrow of the monarchy in the name of democratization a more formidable task that is less imaginable by their people. Furthermore, varying structural factors of the regimes also play a significant role in their resilience. In general, the survival of monarchical regimes is contingent on their institutional flexibility in attentive management of the regime’s coalition of supporters and society at large. The eight modern Arab monarchies vary, however, in their relationship between the regime coalition and society, leading to varying survival strategies.
Answer:
In my opinion carter's speech of Crisis of confidence was to raise the confidence of american people in the government.
Explanation:
Carter's speech in June 1979 detailed a growing sense that Americans were experiencing a crisis of confidence.
Carter's administration was fighting with increasing unemployment, Inflation, and increasing energy cost.
Carter was assumed to return the nation's support and hope for the America's better future - instead performed political self-destruction - speech came off as if he moving and withdrawing opposition - enforced Americans distrust of government.
In times of war free speech may or can be more limited than in times of peace is correct apex.
