Suppose that a>b>1, then
and 
Therefore, since 2<3<7, 
Choose an arbitrary x>1. You have that a takes the greatest values at x, c takes the smallest value at x. Thus,
a>b>c and
Answer: correct option is B.
Answer:
-0.20
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the data:
Age at auction (x) ____price sold (y)
391
51
32
84
47
104
88
43
470
51
Y:
76.9
95.4
86.3
49.3
80
57
47.8
80
70
86.9
General formula for a simple linear regression :
y = ab + c
Where ;
y = predicted variable ; a = slope / gradient
b = predictor / independent variable ; c = intercept
From the result obtained from the calculator :
y = -0.01246X + 74.65552
Correlation Coefficient is used to measure the strength of relationship between linear variables.
The regression Coefficient obtained is - 0.20
This shows that there is a weak negative correlation between the age at auction and the price at which painting is sold. This is because the negative sign means that value of y decreases as x increases or vice versa, however, due to a correlation vale which is closer to 0 than 1 or - 1, we can conclude that the negative relationship between the variables is weak.
Line. A line would have a length but has no width
So ASA is angle side angle, and that means that if you prove that the side, and the side adjacent to that side and the angle between those two sides are all congruent to another triangle's sides and angle, the triangles are both congruent.
The AAS is angle angle side, or something, so say you have a triangle and you prove that two of its angles are congruent along with a side to another triangle's, then it's AAS. I understand where the confusion might be. I guess it's just a matter of what you state first in your proof?
5+6.50+7.21=18.71 30-18.71=$11.29 left
