1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arlik [135]
3 years ago
6

To reform means _____. to change or improve something by correcting faults or removing abuses to export goods to a colony to kee

p things the same to make someone an indentured servant
History
2 answers:
Aloiza [94]3 years ago
8 0
To reform means to change or improve something by correcting faults.
Komok [63]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is A) to change or improve something by correcting faults or removing abuses.

<em>To reform means to change or improve something by correcting faults or removing abuses. </em>

Reformation is the right thing to do when previously governments have committed unfair practices or have made wrong decisions that had negative consequences for the citizens. Reformation implies the change of thing that used to be in the past or to correct whatever needs to modify in order to improve any situation. For instance, a government could reforms law if people considered they need to change or adapt to the new living conditions.  

You might be interested in
PART A: What do the three conflicts in America have in common? A They were supported by reason and evidence. B They were resolve
Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

The wars were fought over fear of losing something that meant great to the people which was America.

7 0
3 years ago
What brought britain and the united states to the brink of war in 1837?
Naddika [18.5K]
The correct answer is the Canadian Rebellion

It was an event in 1837 in which the Lower and Upper Canada had a series of rebellions against Britain because of the way they were treated as colonies. This brought them on the Brink of war with the United States for various reasons, mostly about Britain controlling areas on the New World and the fact that Canada didn't look the same as it does today.
4 0
3 years ago
What did the sadducees and the pharisees have in common?
Pavel [41]
The answer is
b. they were against the teachings of Jesus
9 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of herodotus'history?
Debora [2.8K]
Herodotus is famously known by the dual moniker, “Father of History, Father of Lies”. Whether or not he deserves the latter epithet is perhaps up for debate. He is sometimes criticized as unserious for his many cultural digressions and travelog sidebars. It would, however, take a truly obtuse and narrow-minded critic to deny him the former title. History as a thing separate from record-keeping and chronicling begins with Herodotus. In and among his entertaining and diverting rabbit trails is some of the best and most important history ever written. He shows those who would do history after him what they were to strive for. It is in the opening lines of the Histories where Herodotus establishes the scope and purpose of history, and in doing so establishes its role in man’s attempt to understand his world.

The lines which begin the Histories are a model of clarity and simplicity. There is no excess rhetoric, no flowery overstatement. Herodotus states succinctly in the above passage the purpose for his account. His “enquiries” (ἱστορία) were made to serve memory and understanding—memory in preserving the deeds of men, understanding in examining how the circumstances of those actions came about.

Herodotus’ treatment of memory in this passage is more than just a simple remembrance. He is doing more than just recording a how, where, and when. The preservation of memory here is active, even aggressive, as if time were attempting to destroy the things of man, and history is a brandished weapon holding it at bay.

Almost as an afterthought, Herodotus appends onto his paean to memory a secondary goal. Among the matters covered will be “…the cause of the conflict between the Greeks and non-Greeks.” This is just casually thrown in as if to remind you to look for it along the way. Here Herodotus is understating his purpose, and by playing down this item, he shows its importance. The discovery of the causes of action, and why men have acted as they have, is the heart of the study of history.

So what is the cause of the conflict between the Greeks and the non-Greeks? What was the spark that began the fire that led the largest army in antiquity to cross from Asia to Europe in order to subdue the cities of Attica and the Peloponnese? Herodotus’ examination of this is more subtle than some will give him credit for, and is composed of one part scholarly guile, and one part showmanship. He will look at the opinions of the Asians and the Greeks, and then settle on the pattern that will lead him through his entire enquiry.

“According to learned Persians, it was the Phoenicians who caused the conflict....”1 So begins Herodotus’ examination of the causes of the great conflict. Right away, he is already showing historians their business - he is sourcing his work. He is telling you whose opinion he is working with. As he proceeds, he relates the Persians’ story of Phoenicians going to Argos and abducting Io. In a turnabout, some Greeks go to Tyre and abduct Europa, while some others go to Colchis and abduct Princess Medea (there is some confusion amongst the Persians as to whether the former group were properly Greek, or Cretan). All of the second round of abductors justify their actions by pointing to Io’s earlier capture.

Finally, the son of the Trojan king, Alexander (Paris), abducts Helen from her home in Sparta. At this point, according to the Persians, the Greeks gain culpability, for “…so far it had only been a matter of abducting women from one another, but the Greeks…took the initiative and launched a military strike against Persia.”2

While it is true that the Persians viewed this kind of rapacious activity to be illegal, they found the Greek reaction to Helen’s abduction odd because, “…it is stupid to get worked up about it....“ They viewed the Greek reaction to be unjust and “…date the origin of their hostility towards the Greece from the fall of Illium.” 3

After sourcing these opinions, and running through them, Herodotus gives his own opinion: forget the abductions; they are not the issue.


3 0
3 years ago
Why did Rizal had to go to Europe?
igomit [66]

Answer:

Rizal's number one goal in leaving for Europe in 1882 became to finish his education. He had finished a route in ophthalmology on the University of Santo Tomas so he should carry out eye surgical procedure on his cataract-stricken mother.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is martin luther king dead
    7·2 answers
  • What do which battle that took place during the American Revolution briefly boosted Colonial Morale
    5·1 answer
  • How did the slave trade change as demand for African slaves grew?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which was a Union or Northern soldier during the Civil War?
    6·2 answers
  • Explain how Shay’s Rebellion led to the Constitutional Convention
    9·1 answer
  • What methods did white Southerners use to limit<br> the freedom of formerly enslaved people?
    5·1 answer
  • "Of all the American Plantations his Majesty has, none are so apt for the building of Shipping as
    15·1 answer
  • Help me fast, please
    13·1 answer
  • Petrified wood is made of: cells <br> sediment<br> Minerals
    11·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the 36˚30´ parallel?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!