What is 3/5 * 2/3 in simplest form
1 answer:
You might be interested in
The graph that represents the given line with slope and y-intercept is as attached below.
<h3>How to interpret Linear Graphs?</h3>
We are given the equation;
x - y - 3 = 0
Now, the standard way we should put the equation would be in slope intercept form which is; y = mx + c
where;
m is slope
c is y-intercept
Thus, our equation can be rearranged to get;
y = x - 3
Thus, y-intercept is c = -3
The graph that represents the given line is as attached below.
Read more about Linear Graphs at; brainly.com/question/14323743
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. none of these answers
Data provides sufficient evidence, at 1% significance level, to support the expert's claim. In addition the p-value (or the observed significance level) is equal to P( T >3.281)
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
represent the mean height for the sample
represent the sample standard deviation for the sample
sample size
represent the value that we want to test
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)
State the null and alternative hypotheses.
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the mean is higher than 10 years, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
If we analyze the size for the sample is < 30 and we don't know the population deviation so is better apply a t test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:
(1)
t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".
Calculate the statistic
We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:
P-value
The first step is calculate the degrees of freedom, on this case:
Since is a one side right tailed test the p value would be:
Conclusion
If we compare the p value and the significance level given we see that
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, so we can't conclude that we have a mean higher than 10 years at 1% of significance.
a. none of these answers