Idk man go to google maybe
a. The pattern of the confirmation votes for the nominees shows that most nominees favor the president's political inclinations and thoughts, while those whose nominations were not confirmed happened when the Senate majority did not come from the president's party.
There are <em>no noticeable </em>exceptions to the pattern of the confirmation votes, which tend to indicate that the party in the majority in the Senate usually confirms the nominees more than the party in the minority.
b. The confirmation votes have always followed a predictable pattern. When the president's political party aligns with the Senate majority party, most nominees are confirmed, sometimes without much debate.
Thus, we can conclude that the president's political party and the majority party in the Senate always influence the confirmation of the nominees or their rejection, as the case may be.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/19243990
Answer:No taxs attoitoin without repersantoin, suspending are own legislatoin, cutting of trade from the rest of the world, transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offences, .
Explanation:
I all these from the deloratoin of independence, which bassically shows everything king george the 3rd did to us. If its wrong Im sorry.
Viruses cannot replicate themselves outisde of a cell.
The correct answer is Isolationists regarding the Treaty of Versailles after World War I
Explanation:
George Washington's words proposed the idea nations should not be part of political issues between other nations. This is expressed in "to have with them as little political connection as possible". This idea is related to the policy of isolationism that refers to nations avoiding participation in international issues.
Moreover, this policy was supported by isolationists in the U.S. regarding the Treaty of Versailles because this treaty proposed the creation of an organization known as the League of nations and as part of this, countries participating including the U.S. accepted to enter the war if necessary, which implied intervening in the conflicts of other countries and this was opposite to the policy of isolationism.
