1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kisachek [45]
3 years ago
7

What are some of the social changes that resulted from the growth of capitalism? What groups would have been most threatened by

or resistant to these changes?
History
1 answer:
Elena L [17]3 years ago
5 0
<span>A socialist postal system, a socialist school system, a socialist welfare system, a socialist economic bailout system, a socialist system of welfare, socialized medicine is coming, and all this due to capitalism. Those most effected are the capitalists who provide jobs and then have their earnings taken away from them by a government that wants to equal things out a bit. By a government who wants to force companies to provide employees with vacations, bonus pay for overtime, insurance, and a whole lot more</span>
You might be interested in
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
4 years ago
Which policy or initiative contributed most to the nuclear arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union
nika2105 [10]

The policy contributed most to the nuclear arms race was Mutual Assured Destruction


This means that both sides knew that any attack upon the other would be devastating to themselves, therefore restraining them from attacking the other. Each side possesses enough nuclear weapons to obliterate the other side that causes them to restrain from attacking afraid of the annihilation.

3 0
3 years ago
What impact did the Columbian exchange have on the formation of the new world societies
igor_vitrenko [27]
Simple. The Columbian Exchange exchanged diseased, people, plants, food, and animals. The Americas adapted with new plants and animals like cattle, chicken, etc., and more slaves. Europe gained potatoes, tomatoes, corn, squash, punpkin, etc.
New societies could depend on new sources of food, new animals. That also improved their local economy, and knowledge (learning)
7 0
3 years ago
Name the powers the Articles of Confederation granted to Congress and explain why these powers weren’t very effective.
hichkok12 [17]

To declare war (and peace),

To appoint and regulate officers of the land and naval forces,

To build a navy,

To set the size of the naval and land forces (to be fulfilled by the States),

To establish rules and courts for the regulation of privateering,

To send ambassadors,

To entering into treaties and alliances (that didn’t affect States to regulate foreign commerce),

To settle, as a last resort, disputes and differences between two or more States concerning boundary and jurisdictional disputes,

To settle controversies concerning private land holders’ rights when the land is disputed by two or more States,

To fix the standards of weights and measures,

To regulate the trade and affairs with Native Americans (without violating State sovereignty),

To establish and regulate post offices,

To set the budget for the United States (to be fulfilled by the States)

To borrow money, and

To appoint a “caretaker” committee during Congressional recesses.


4 0
3 years ago
Why did Germany pass the Nuremberg Laws under Adolf Hilters leadership
jeyben [28]

Answer:

Two distinct laws passed in Nazi Germany in September 1935 are known collectively as the Nuremberg Laws: the Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. These laws embodied many of the racial theories underpinning Nazi ideology. They would provide the legal framework for the systematic persecution of Jews in Germany.

Adolf Hitler announced the Nuremberg Laws on September 15, 1935. Germany’s parliament (the Reichstag), then made up entirely of Nazi representatives, passed the laws. Antisemitism was of central importance to the Nazi Party, so Hitler had called parliament into a special session at the annual Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg, Germany. The Nazis had long sought a legal definition that identified Jews not by religious affiliation but according to racial antisemitism. Jews in Germany were not easy to identify by sight. Many had given up traditional practices and appearances and had integrated into the mainstream of society. Some no longer practiced Judaism and had even begun celebrating Christian holidays, especially Christmas, with their non-Jewish neighbors. Many more had married Christians or converted to Christianity.

According to the Reich Citizenship Law and many ancillary decrees on its implementation, only people of “German or kindred blood” could be citizens of Germany. A supplementary decree published on November 14, the day the law went into force, defined who was and was not a Jew. The Nazis rejected the traditional view of Jews as members of a religious or cultural community. They claimed instead that Jews were a race defined by birth and by blood.

Despite the persistent claims of Nazi ideology, there was no scientifically valid basis to define Jews as a race. Nazi legislators looked therefore to family genealogy to define race. People with three or more grandparents born into the Jewish religious community were Jews by law. Grandparents born into a Jewish religious community were considered “racially” Jewish. Their “racial” status passed to their children and grandchildren. Under the law, Jews in Germany were not citizens but “subjects" of the state.

This legal definition of a Jew in Germany covered tens of thousands of people who did not think of themselves as Jews or who had neither religious nor cultural ties to the Jewish community. For example, it defined people who had converted to Christianity from Judaism as Jews. It also defined as Jews people born to parents or grandparents who had converted to Christianity. The law stripped them all of their German citizenship and deprived them of basic rights.

To further complicate the definitions, there were also people living in Germany who were defined under the Nuremberg Laws as neither German nor Jew, that is, people having only one or two grandparents born into the Jewish religious community. These “mixed-raced” individuals were known as Mischlinge. They enjoyed the same rights as “racial” Germans, but these rights were continuously curtailed through subsequent legislation.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • which muslim ruler born a nomad, established an empire that eventually spanned three continents- Asis, Africa, and Europe?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a counterclaim in an argumentative essay?
    15·2 answers
  • The price of television decreased which means the demand for blank will most likely increase
    5·1 answer
  • What did Congress authorize in 1996, which was later declared unconstitutional, in order to let the President reject specific pa
    11·2 answers
  • why did members of the House Un-American Activities Committee target screenwriters, directors, and others who made their living
    8·2 answers
  • Which belief was generally held by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following belief systems argues that respect for parents and elders is important for social order?
    6·2 answers
  • What were the names of the laws that were introduced to make sure trade with the colonies was favorable to England?
    6·2 answers
  • The Huang He flows to the __________.
    8·2 answers
  • What were two effects of the Louisiana Purchase on the United States? ​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!