Answer:
D. Right to leave the country
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison, legal case in which, on February 24, 1803, the U.S. Supreme Court first declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, thus establishing the doctrine of judicial review. The court's opinion, written by Chief Justice John Marshall, is considered one of the foundations of U.S. constitutional law.
Answer:
Explanation:
Keynes wrote his economic theories during the Great Depression of the 1930’s. In his model, capitalism is comprised of consumer spending, business spending, government spending, and the net foreign sector.
The success of the Competition policy is to provide more product varieties with enhanced quality whereas the failure is the wastage of resources for enhancing the production.
<h3>
When was the competition policy introduced?</h3>
The policy of Competition was introduced in the year 1998 in the country of South Africa for regulating the competition.
The objectives of the Competition policy were to encourage the growth, efficiency, and adaptation feature in the economy of South Africa and the purpose of providing products to the customers at competitive prices and with varied alternatives.
Therefore, the introduction of competition policy has both the success and failure of its own which are explained above.
Learn more about the competition policy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/23893506
#SPJ1
This statement is true.
<em>A contingency fee </em>is a method of paying someone ( for example a lawyer or a scientist ,) in which no money is paid until a particular aim is achieved. In other words, the lawyer will only get paid if he wins the case.
Mark is a forensic scientist. To agree to be compensated for his work through contingency fees presents him<em> with a potential conflict of interest and work ethics.</em> This should be avoided in his profession and it is marked as a guiding principle to be obeyed.
Mark would have a financial incentive to provide a forensic opinion that is favorable to his client ( only then he would be paid for his work). This is seen as a<em> threat to impartiality,</em> the forensic may use the evidence in a way that favors the positive outcome of the case. This is strictly prohibited as all medical ( forensic ) opinions should<em> be based on facts only </em>and not to be influenced by any kind of reward or personal gain obtained through them.