D is the correct answer
Interestingly enough, the world did not see an increase in the number of hijackings after 9/11, which possibly could be credited to increased security measures.
The Germanic tribes that took over the Roman Empire territory in the west had a history as tribal and hunting/agricultural societies. Even in times when it was fracturing in many ways, the Roman Empire was built around central organization and governance. The Germanic tribes had been more loyal to their own tribal groups than they were confederated into a unity with one another. Their historical patterns of development also had been more built around hunting and farming. They were not as developed in coordinating government over a massive stretch of territory. The Germans had begun learning things from the Romans during the years when many of them served as mercenaries in Roman armies. And they would learn more about building a far-reaching system of government. They were not ignorant "barbarians" when they took over Roman territory, but they weren't united in a plan to govern the region as a unit the way Rome had.
For comparison, you might think of the difference between the Native American nations that existed in North America when settlers from Europe came and took over their territory. In that case, the situation was reversed. The native tribal nations were used to operating independently as their own tribal nations, and were focused largely on hunting and agriculture. The white settlers were aiming at building a society more similar to how Rome had operated.
Answer: Roman law is the legal system of ancient Rome, including the legal developments spanning over a thousand years of jurisprudence, from the Twelve Tables (c. 449 BC), to the Corpus Juris Civilis (AD 529) ordered by Eastern Roman Emperor Justinian I. Roman law forms the basic framework for civil law, the most widely used legal system today, and the terms are sometimes used synonymously. The historical importance of Roman law is reflected by the continued use of Latin legal terminology in many legal systems influenced by it, including common law.
Explanation:
Wasn't one of them the 9/11 attack?
∵∴∵answer∵∴∵
the invasion of China.
∵∴∵description∵∴∵
invasion from Japan to China.
This invasion was not well seen and was a concern for the Western powers since Japan acquired land of enormous China and increased its military power (let's not forget that Japan was an ally of Germany, therefore an enemy for the allies).
The allied request is that Japan cease its attacks immediately on China, Japan did not.
Then, the English and the United States seized the metal supplies to Japan and blocked the access of the Panama Canal for Japanese ships.
This increases the tension between these countries
Subsequently, Japan decides to continue its expedition to the south of the Pacific with the intention of acquiring resources, territories, and influence.
Tensions continued to rise, and the final trigger is the decision (much questioned) of attacking Pearl Harbor.
/.) (.\
/)\| |/(\
//)/ hope this helps -Tom \(\\
/'"^" "^"`\
