1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BaLLatris [955]
3 years ago
7

PLEASE HELP!

History
1 answer:
kotegsom [21]3 years ago
4 0
Because they come from a different place with a different system compared with the city. Rules and procedures are unknown so they are forced to rely upon and trust people whom they know in the city. The urban people are knowledgeable in their area and have better instructions to give.


You might be interested in
In the last six months of the war, what was the U.S. strategy for winning the conflict with Japan?
postnew [5]
The correct option is D. During the last six months of the war, the United States of America, release atomic bombs on two different cities of Japan within a short space of interval. This move was not expected at all by the Japanese and it served as the final stroke that breaks the elephant's back. It leads to quick surrender by the Japanese.
4 0
3 years ago
HELP I NEED HELP ON THIS QUESTION. drag each important event of the united states' development as a superpower to arrange them f
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

Because without the Soviet Army we a had to influence the world some how.

8 0
3 years ago
What competing views of the presidency were held by the framers?
Tamiku [17]
Long-term v. short-term presidency: Some wanted lifelong terms down to two year terms--there were concerns of chaotic changes not allowing for stability and the states' rights side (Anti-Federalists) wanted the ability to change power often. 
There were also discussions regarding qualifications and powers of the president. Most of the disagreements were decided by compromise leading to the government that is created out of the Constitutional Convention. 
6 0
3 years ago
5) According to John Green, why was Luther successful with his rebellion when others before him had failed?
gayaneshka [121]

5. According to John Green, Luther's success with the rebellion stemmed from his ability to, initially, make his teachings resonate with peasants and youths. But this resonance did not last long. Luther soon turned his teachings against the peasants in favor of the kings and princes.

6. <em>Luther's or the peasants' argument</em> about serfdom was correct. No one should endure bondage or serfdom, with increasing taxation without representation.

7. The reasons that Princes and Kings defied the Pope and broke away from the Church were<em> to possess landed property formerly owned by the Church (</em><em>Wealth</em><em>)</em>, <em>decide how they practiced religion (e.g. </em><em>divorce</em><em>)</em>, <em>and boost their </em><em>military powers</em><em> </em>(making people loyal to the government instead of to the Church).

8. The Reformation was ultimately a wrong move because it split the Church, creating too many denominations with different and confusing interpretations of the Bible. However, there are some valuable lessons. It separated the Church from the state. It created religious freedom.

The Church has no business mingling with the state.  The Church and the state should remain separate, complementing each other like institutions. Governments should not regulate religion because it is a <em>personal endeavor</em>. It is a <em>spiritual enterprise</em> and not <em>social or economic</em>. There are some aspects of life in which the state should not involve itself. Otherwise, individual rights suffer jeopardy.

Thus, the Reformation was a bag of the good and the ugly. Reformation should happen <em>within and not without</em> the Church. Luther's outcome seems to be projected from Satan. Any Reformation outside the Church is no Reformation. It is simply Separation and Division, generating Confusion.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/18535898

5 0
3 years ago
What were the consequences of the decline of the mughal empire​
AVprozaik [17]

A series of foreign invasions affected Mughal Empire very badly. Attacks by Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali, which were themselves the consequences of the weakness of the Empire, drained the Empire of its wealth, ruined its trade and industry in the North, and almost destroyed its military power.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • All of the following are principles that help guide historians in their work EXCEPT which one?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following most contributed to the decline of the ranching industry in the late 1880s?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the Great Depression take place in America
    11·2 answers
  • The best way to describe paleolithic peoples and their way of life is by calling them
    15·1 answer
  • The governor has the power to veto laws from which body of government?
    5·1 answer
  • 13. Complete this analogy: The Bible is to Christianity as the _______ is to Islam. Hadith Torah Qur'an Talmud
    8·2 answers
  • Which is a strength of the Articles of Confederation?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the method for approving the ordinance of secession?
    6·1 answer
  • What effects did the Kansas-Nebraska Act have on the two new territories? Check all of the boxes that apply. Territories were al
    8·2 answers
  • Help
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!