Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
America : Woodrow Wilson
Germany : Friedrich Ebert
great Britain : David Lloyd George
Answer: 10 is c and 11 is A
Explanation:
Answer: It could be all but OC
Explanation: You can see in the way that they word the answers how this would be the answer. Human effort is a part of the creation of products, you need resources to even start production, and nature could effect production.
