Answer:
the answer of no 25 is B
the answer of no 26 is A:2,4 and 5
The correct order for the introductory paragraph of this argumentative essay is;
- Children under the age of twelve should be not be allowed to play tackle football. First, since the discovery of the degenerative brain disease, C.T.E., which is caused by repetitive hits to the head, the people who support tackle football have been put on the defensive-- and for good reason. Second, there are many safer options than tackle football for children who love athletics. Third, although there have been changes made to the equipment and rules of tackle football, it is still not safe enough. Americans value their children much more than a game, don't they?
An argumentative essay is one where the author makes a claim and provides facts and evidence to back it up.
In the argumentative text above, the claim is that "Children under the age of twelve should not be allowed to play tackle football." To support this claim, facts are reeled out in sequential order.
It makes sense to add a rhetorical question at the end which the reader answers based on the evidence provided.
Thus, the argumentative essay can be ordered in the above form.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/17344069
Answer:
Use Sentence Fragments Sparingly and When the Story Calls for It. Sentence fragments in fiction can be a useful way of conveying pace, tone, and intensity. However, overuse can lead to lazy writing—fragments should be used sparingly, and for a good storytelling purpose. I think it’s when the cast of characters includes just two characters I’m not 100% right on this
Answer:
D- Job B offers more days off and employee benefits
Explanation:
The letter from Samuel Johnson shown above was made as a refusal to request a woman who would like to receive sponsorship from a bishop to send her son to university.
In the Letter, Johnson explains the reasons that led him to reject this request, stating that they cannot ask the bishop he does not know, sponsorship for a boy the bishop does not know. This is because this type of sponsorship was something very big, with great economic expense. Therefore, this was not offered to strangers, but only to people with whom the sponsors had knowledge and a certain intimacy.
In this letter, Johnson makes recurring use of ethos and logos. He uses ehos, when he shows that he is rejecting the request in the most ethical and respectable way possible, and, he uses logos, when he shows that the refusal is not being made for personal reasons, but for the logic of the situation.
Finally, Johnson says that he believes that the woman's son is a brilliant boy and that it is not necessary for him to go to university to be a great man.
