1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bagirrra123 [75]
4 years ago
13

The power to establish a national bank is classified as?

History
2 answers:
Mumz [18]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The power to establish a national bank is classified as an implicit power of Congress.

Explanation:

It is not explicit in the constitution that Congress can establish a national bank, but this is an implicit power that Congress has. That is, the creators of the constitution did not have in mind the possibility of the congress to create a national bank, but that power was given to the congress by another political agreement.

nekit [7.7K]4 years ago
6 0
The power to establish a national bank is classified as A. an implied power of Congress.
You might be interested in
The last imperial dynasty in Chinese history was the _____.<br> Ming<br> Song<br> Yuan<br> Qing
Marat540 [252]
The Qing dynasty was the last in Chinese history, ruling from 1644 to 1912
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Benedict Arnold was first a hero then a traitor.<br> a. True<br> b. False
Shkiper50 [21]
Yes, it is true that Benedict Arnold was first a hero then a traitor, although it should be noted that he was less a "hero" and more simply a well-respected war officer during the Revolution. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Which of the following did the Monroe Doctrine permit in Latin America?
Arlecino [84]

Answer: Transport of goods

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Please help ASAP I will mark you as brainliest
OLga [1]

Answer:hoy

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did the Supreme Court's actions in United States v. Cruikshank impact Reconstruction efforts?
Anit [1.1K]
<span>1876 Supreme Court case ruled against any individual right to bear armsSecond Amendment guaranteed only states' rights to maintain militiasState governments could regulate guns however they saw fit<span>Presser v. Illinois affirmed Cruikshank ruling, further clarified that Second Amendment rights had not been "incorporated"—that is, they were not binding on the states</span></span>
Until quite recently, the answer to that question was pretty simple—the Court's interpretation of the Second Amendment was established in just a few cases. The first of these was United States v. Cruikshank. You can read more about this case here, but the short version is that in 1876 the Court ruled that the Second Amendment served only to protect the states against the federal government. Because the states in 1787 were worried that a too-powerful federal government might trample their rights, the Court said, the Second Amendment was added to the Constitution guaranteeing their right to maintain militias. The Second Amendment did not, in this interpretation, provide any individual right to keep and bear arms; it only guaranteed a state's right to maintain a militia. Moreover, since these militias were to be "well regulated," and since the Second Amendment was aimed only at the threat posed by the federal government, state governments were—according to this ruling—free to regulate guns in any manner they saw fit.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which body of water is NOT part of the waterway that connects the Black Sea to the Mediterranean Sea
    12·2 answers
  • What argument did the colonists use to support their call for<br> independence? <br> Need help
    9·1 answer
  • Greek culture and democracy _______
    12·1 answer
  • What did President Kennedy mean when he called the National Academy of Sciences the "seedbed of our nation's future"?
    7·1 answer
  • Describe what New Mexican soldiers of Battery A did to earn their battle stars?
    13·2 answers
  • Use the following article to answer the question:
    8·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    15·1 answer
  • Briefly explain ONE major difference between Ellis’s and Meacham’s historical interpretations of how Thomas Jefferson came to ap
    5·1 answer
  • POINTS + BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP. :(
    7·1 answer
  • Was Document D Ahmed Khan trustworthy and why
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!