Answer:
No, I do not think it was necessary.
Explanation:
The Sedition act was uncharacteristic of the initial thoughts of the forefathers of the United States because it went against the freedom of speech and freedom of press. Although it seemed to be a quick fix to stop dissention in the U.S. with anti war sentiment, it also invalidated the very constitution for which the U.S stood on. There could have been better ways to handle it such as educating the public better on what exactly was happening, and why we might as a country needed to become involved in the war.
Earlier in the 1700s, the French & Indian war happened in which Great Britain was involved in. They made taxes so they could pay all of their soldiers for fighting in the war.
Parthenon I believe.... that's what I last remember
According to manifest destiny, that America should be able to obtain Texas as well as the Oregon country. O' Sullivan said that it was for the "free development of our yearly multiplying millions".
It depends on the country. Some countries have respect for their enemies and would return bodies of fallen soldiers. Others would keep them as trophies. It completely depends on the country.
