Basically its saying photography has become a bit too focused on the past - even if it’s the immediate past. Just take all that talk about, let’s say, how colour photography became an accepted part of art photography (you could also pick the New Topographics<span> or whatever else). And then re-read the quotes…
or saying </span> <span>Fitting in is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion.
Being new is not sufficient.
Popularity right now is not enough.
Someone liking the poem now is not enough.
Does a poem conform to the new times?
Is a poem individual and different?
These are coexisting requirements for a poem to be valuable.
>is a work of art that conforms completely really a work of art?
"Conforming", in the sense of forming the leadership for a new age.
Yes, conforming is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for a poem:
"its fitting in is a test of its value–a test,"
>should contemporary works of art be judged as “better” or “worse” than past ones?
There is no way that new poems be as bad as old poems, or their canons.
"certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."</span>
A good paragraph has 5 to 7 sentences.
Simple and direct, kind of like it sounds. Short and to the point.
Hope this helped!
The answer is C. "<span>This excerpt is part of the conflict resolution. It expresses the theme that animals are better prepared to survive nature’s elements than humans."</span>
Answer:(A) because of an oversight in military strategy
Explanation: Winston Churchill is of the opinion that France lost the war as a result of an unintentional mistake from its strategy. France methodological warfare approach was met by a superior military approach, that immediately France succumb to defeat.
France were faced with various failed allied counter attacks, despite having an advantage with superior armored force numerically , the French failed to utilize it properly by launching an attack on the vulnerable German.
