<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
In mid-1999, the Walt Disney Company and the Hong Kong Government were associated with extraordinary exchanges about the likelihood of building the Hong Kong Disneyland amusement park on Lantau Island.
This case displayed point by point data about the proposed amusement park and the related basic leadership process with a specific accentuation on feasible improvement. It likewise spreads out the qualities of the Hong Kong Government and Hong Kong individuals that may have assumed a job in choice making.The case incorporates An and B parts concerning corporate and government basic leadership.
It right off the bat outlines the arrangement procedure among Disney and the Hong Kong Government, and considered the natural effect on Hong Kong. The troubles looked by governments in settling on choices about this exceptionally unmistakable vast scale venture are depicted.
It at that point clarifies the method of reasoning of the administration choice, which represents how legislative structure and culture influence the basic leadership process. At last, it demonstrated upgrades in Hong Kong Disneyland regarding practical administration and advancement.
Well colonial America had a lot less people and pretty much no government, so you would pretty much be able to do whatever you want, short of major offenses and get away with it.
A down side would be, There was a lot of disease and you would have to work extremely hard day and night, to make a living and to be able to eat. you would also most likely have to fight Indians.
I hope this helps, Have an amazing day!
Answer:
Anderson and his soldiers prepare to depart the fort by raising their flag. Unfortunately, the only injuries at Fort Sumter occur when a round explodes prematurely during the 100-gun salute, killing Pvt. Daniel Hough and seriously wounding another soldier. Although the onslaught was ended, the conflict had only just begun.
What the dude on top said
