1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dalvyx [7]
3 years ago
5

Comitatus was a bond between an Anglo-Saxon lord and his retainer. a. True b. False

History
2 answers:
guapka [62]3 years ago
6 0

The statement "Comitatus was a bond between an Anglo-Saxon lord and his retainer," is true. Option A is correct.

In ancien times, the Latin term Comitatus refered to an armed escort or retinue. The term was employed particularly in the context of Germanic warrior culture, for a warband tied to a leader by an oath of fealty.

In other words, it is a leader, especially in pre-Christian Germanic cultures like Anglo-Saxon England and Viking Age Scandinavia.

Elenna [48]3 years ago
3 0
No, it is technically false that <span>Comitatus was a bond between an Anglo-Saxon lord and his retainer, since this had more to do with the relationship between the two subordinates. </span>
You might be interested in
According to the Declaration of Independence, what should the people do when the government fails to protect their rights?
sammy [17]
The people have the right to overthrow the government is it doesn't protect their rights. This is called being a tyrant government and it is not allowed in the constitution. <span />
8 0
3 years ago
Explain two ways in which the Arab conquests changed Europe and the Middle East in the 600s and 700s CE
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

The Abbasids overthrew the Umayyad dynasty in 750 CE, supporting the mawali, or non-Arab Muslims, by moving the capital to Baghdad in 762 CE. The Persian bureaucracy slowly replaced the old Arab aristocracy as the Abbasids established the new positions of vizier and emir to delegate their central authority.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best explains how a theocracy and an absolute monarchy are different ?
never [62]

Answer: A theocracy uses religious beliefs as a basis for laws, where as an absolute monarchy may have non-religious laws.

Explanation: Apex

6 0
3 years ago
What lead yo the finacial crisis of 2007
MakcuM [25]
A breakdown of trust within the financial systems, Vaults, Banks, etc.
3 0
4 years ago
7) The Cold War dominated international politics during the 1950s and 1960s.
Bad White [126]

Answer:

A. creation of arms race

C. Provoked military conflicts in Korea and Vietnam.

E. Brought the world close to nuclear war over Cuba.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these gave freedom, citizenship, and voting rights to African american men after the civil war?
    10·2 answers
  • Which letter shows the route of vascular de gama
    5·1 answer
  • Which feature of the constitution was introduced to reduce the possible influence of an "overbearing majority"?
    13·1 answer
  • Which was the only empire to include a Saharan salt mine?
    8·1 answer
  • In what year was the first Civil Rights Act passed? A. 1866 B. 1870 C. 1926 D. 1965
    14·1 answer
  • What factors are necessary to bring
    11·1 answer
  • What statement best describes the concept of civic duty?
    11·2 answers
  • What happened when the forts in New Mexico were abandoned during the Civil War?
    6·1 answer
  • Thomas Jefferson tried to end...
    11·1 answer
  • What does Schenck suggest for citizens to do in order to protest the draft?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!