The first and the third sentences contain parallel structures. Parallel structure, or parallelism, is the repetition of the same grammatical structure or form within a sentence, so it becomes more balanced, and, therefore, more readable and clear to understand.
In the first sentence, the parallel structure has been used in the comparison: "... would make war <em>rather than let</em> the nation survive and accept war<em> rather than let</em> it perish..."
In the third sentence the same grammatical form has been used too: "<em>all dreaded it </em>(1) <em>all sought to</em> avert <em>it </em>(2)."
The words “You don’t have to feel like a waste of space” meaning that you yourself are worth something so you are not a waste. “You are original, cannot be replaced” it means you are the only one out there. Nobody is exactly like you, so if you disappear no replica can be made. “If you only knew what the future holds” means that there is a lot of potential for you and it gets better in the future. “After a hurricane comes a rainbow” meaning that it always gets worse before it gets better. So in all it starts from telling you, you are something and someone and to keep in mind that it will be worse but in the future the rainbow will show the light of how it gets better.
I hope I explained well~~~
Answer:
Finish something very quickly.
Explanation:
Title "Closed Too Soon" means finish something very quickly and early. Ha say it is "too soon" because he thought that it takes more time to end it. Brother Quang means that war between individuals or nations are based on their difference in beliefs and opinion. each side considered their selves right and considered other side wrong in order to protect their belief and for this purpose they fought war with each other. A blind conviction might be their belief on which they fought with each other.
It seems that the BJP government’s decision to illegalise the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets has its roots in a PIL that quotes the five-yearly Gadhimai festival in Nepal, where thousands of buffaloes are taken from India to be sacrificed to ‘appease’ Gadhimai, the goddess of power.
The contradictions that emerge from cattle – here encompassing all bovines – slaughter rules in Nepal perplex many: despite being predominantly Hindu, animal sacrifice continues to be practised. Cow slaughter is explicitly prohibited even in Nepal’s new constitution since it is the national animal, yet the ritual sacrifice of buffaloes and the consumption of their meat is not frowned upon. There is also, in marked contrast to the Indian government’s blanket approach to cattle terminology, a lucid distinction between cows (both the male and female) and other ‘cattle’ species (such as buffaloes and yaks).
The emergence of this contradictory, often paradoxical, approach to cattle slaughter in Nepal is the result of a careful balancing act by the rulers of modern Nepal. The Shah dynasty and the Rana prime ministers often found themselves at a crossroads to explicitly define the rules of cattle slaughter. As rulers of a perceived ‘asal Hindu-sthan’, their dharma bound them to protect the cow – the House of Gorkha borrows its name from the Sanskrit ‘gou-raksha’ – but as they expanded into an empire, their stringent Brahminic rules came into conflict with des-dharma, or existing local customs, where cattle-killing was a norm. What followed was an intentionally ambiguous approach to cattle slaughter, an exercise in social realpolitik.
Answer:
because it can have someting to do with the message of the story
Explanation:
