1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liraira [26]
3 years ago
7

Why do you think the Aztecs allowed some conquered peoples to govern themselves with relatively little interference?

History
1 answer:
Sati [7]3 years ago
3 0
The Aztecs demanded that a tribute in goods be paid to them, after they conquered a specific land. As long as the tribute was paid (which ensured their financial position), it was beneficial for them if the conquered people didn't revolt (too much), and if they didn't need to extend funds and infrastructure to govern them- that way they could pay little and maximize their gain. It was practical to reinstall the old rulers in the conquered lands, if they were sure of their loyalty, as it would minimize conflict and need for intervention (such as sending a lot of people into the new land) and maximize their profit.
You might be interested in
Written during the Vietnam War, the_______revealed the Federal government did not think the war could ever be won despite tellin
Stels [109]

I believe it’s B. Paris Peace Accords. I think?

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What civil rights act of 1964 did?
andrey2020 [161]
Labor Law In the United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion,sex national origin and later sexual orientation and gender identity.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why do you think settlers from the united states who had settles in texas in the 1830s wanted to break free from mexico and form
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

because they wanted to

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
To help prevent further terrorist acts, the U.S. felt that it was necessary to end the Taliban regime in
Alchen [17]
The answer will be a because its a

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was Briggs v. Elliot? What is its historical significance? In your own words
BARSIC [14]

Briggs v. Elliott.  It was the first of the five cases combined into Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the famous case in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional, violating the Fourteenth Amendment 's Equal Protection Clause. Following the Brown decision,...

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does Aristotle believe that monarchy is controversial?
    10·1 answer
  • - - - - - -is the systematic study of the ways interaction, interdependence and influence among persons affect their behavior an
    15·1 answer
  • What comparisons does Voltaire make between England and his native country?
    5·1 answer
  • Andres young was part of which group
    14·2 answers
  • How did modern innovation help with the harsh summer climate of Oklahoma?
    11·2 answers
  • 8. The Good Neighbor Policy was created in 1973 during the Vietnam War.<br> True<br> False
    11·1 answer
  • If you owned a business what would you offer as goods or services?
    15·1 answer
  • Which below do countries not have to think about when deciding what to trading?
    11·1 answer
  • When did Christopher Columbus discover america​
    13·2 answers
  • Hallar el precio de una computadora que costaba s/.3600 pero tiene un descuento de 15% por un dia de trabajo y 20% por pagar al
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!