Southern states have begun to contribute more and more since the time especially Texas.
Explanation:
It is seen in the trend that there are more southern people who have a culture of joining the army than any other and it is specially true for Texas.
One other state Colorado and a few other states that have actually begun to contribute more are on the west coast with the east coast contributing the least to the army and there being a lack of actual need to get in and get drafted.
This has come to be due to the increase in the Conservationism of the people in south and the disillusion of the urban with the army.
Answer:
D) avoidance-avoidance
Explanation:
Avoidance-avoidance approach: The term "avoidance-avoidance approach" is described as an approach to conflict that generally occurs when there is a specific event or goal that can either consist of negative and positive characteristics or effects that makes event or goal unappealing and appealing at the same time.
In the question above, the given statement represents the avoidance-avoidance approach to conflict.
Answer:
<h2>How to body a paragraph :)</h2>
<em>Topic sentence</em> (also known as the "hook," state your opinion / point of view
<em>Major supporting evidence</em>
<em>Minor support 1</em>
<em>Minor support 2</em>
<em>Conclusion</em> (restate main topic sentence + summarize your 3 points pf evidence)
Explanation:
Example:
"<em>In the movie "Iron Will" / "Mazy May" the use of dogs as work animals is protrayed as postive/negative by...(give example). Because of this, I agree/disagree with the use of dogs as work animals.</em>"
Now <em>expand</em> on that first example, use "<em>pathos ethos logos</em>" to create an emotional but also <em>logical </em>reason for your opinion. (This means, use both emotional examples from these films, and also logical examples (how the dogs as work animals were helpful / useful compared to other animals...or not if you are against that view))
Add 2 more <em>minor</em> examples, but keep them vague so that the paragraph does not become too lengthy (<em>this is not an essay</em>).
Summarize your points, and restate your opinion.
Answer:
Federal courts may hear cases concerning state laws if the issue is whether the state law violates the federal Constitution
