Answer:
1.<em> The kindred of Cain crushed with his vengeance;</em>
2<em>The monster of evil, Greedy and cruel tarried but little,</em>.
Explanation:
The poem Beowulf is about a dangerous creature named Grendel who terrorized King Hrothgar of the Dane Kingdom. He would intercept the banquets held by the King and then slaughter anyone he laid his hands on, even eating them.
He was described as a descendant of Cain probably because of his vengeful hatred which made him take people's lives. The evidence is in this text from the poem:
<em> </em><em>The kindred of Cain crushed with his vengeance;</em>
<em />
He was also described as a monster because of the harm he perpetuated and his fearful physical features. The evidence is in this text:
<em>The monster of evil, Greedy and cruel tarried but little,</em>
He was later conquered by Beowulf who left his kingdom to come and defeat him.
Answer:
i mean they need to eat and drink right?
Explanation:
<span>"It took them a minute to grasp what he was saying, even who he was. " This line gives us a hint that they probably had forgotten about Ravi because they tried so hard to remember who he was.And indeed, the next sentence which says "They had quite forgotten him." confirms that they definitely had completely forgotten about him.
The sentence at the end of the paragraph - "</span><span>Having disappeared from the scene, he had disappeared from their minds." gives us an idea that Ravi was completely wiped out from the children's minds, which is a saddening truth. </span>
Many people don't have a photo identification. Requiring people to show a photo identification to vote would keep those without this type of identification from voting. Those who often don't have identification include elderly individuals who no longer drive and citizens living in high poverty areas where transportation is limited. They would be denied the chance to vote. Sociologist Mark Abernathy writes, "requiring photo identification in order to vote essentially eliminates a whole population of American voters. These voters are part of society, but they are denied a basic right guaranteed to all Americans over the age of eighteen. Elections are then determined by only a smallportion of the population, not the entire population" (page 820 of the article "Photo Identification Disenfranchisement"). Some people think this is not true. Ria Olberson, an economist at Alabaster University, states, "Few Americans are without drivers' licenses. Even if the license is expired or revoked, it still counts as photo identification. To claim that requiring identification disenfranchises a segment of the American population is simply inaccurate" (page 101). Olberson is just wrong! A lot of people don't have licenses because they either don't need them or they don't want them. Consider people living in major cities. They have no reason to get driver's licenses: public transportation. This extremely large group of people would be forced to obtain driver's licenses to participate in a process that they are guaranteed as citizens of the United States
