Answer:
In America, the presidential election system is not through the direct vote of the citizenry, but through the indirect election carried out by the Electoral College. Thus, each voting citizen gives his cast to a specific candidate, but said will must be endorsed by the electors of his state in the Electoral College.
In this regard, each state has the number of voters equal to the number of congressmen it has in the federal Congress. Thus, for example, states like Montana or Alaska have 3 electors (since they have 2 senators and 1 representative), while California has 55.
The problem is that, to determine the electoral votes of each candidate, it has been established that whoever wins the popular votes in the state takes all the votes of the electors of that state (except in the case of Maine and Nebraska). For this reason, it may happen that a candidate in California defeats his opponent 50.1% to 49.9%, in what would be almost a technical tie, but takes 100% of the electoral votes. Thus, the right of citizens to the election of their representatives is violated, and a candidate who has not obtained the majority of the popular vote (as happened in 2016 with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton) could win in the Electoral College.
Thus, many candidates adopt the strategy of campaigning and giving all their effort in the states with the largest number of voters such as California, Texas, Florida or New York, leaving aside other states considered less important.
Answer:
it led colonists to become more active in their religion,
Explanation:
The Great Awakening affected the colonies in several ways, including that it led colonists to become more active in their religion, that it encouraged them to develop a more personal connection to religion, and that it contributed to the American Revolution by implying that religious authorities were not all-powerful.
Answer:
D. Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces, but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not
Explanation:
The genocides in Bosnia and Rwanda are part of the numerous genocides that took place in the past several decades. The genocide in Bosnia was initiated by Serbian nationalist, and it was toward the Muslims and the Croatians. The international community did reacted though to stop it, and sent its military forces in order to put things under control. The genocide in Rwanda though took another course. The Hutu started to perform genocide over the Tutsi minority, but the international community was hesitating should it react or not, if it does in which way, and while it was thinking the genocide was going on and on. Luckily for the Tutsi people, they had their own military forces that were well equipped, so they managed to stop the aggression form the Hutu before they made a full scale genocide.
I would say New York vs. United States because it’s main point is on federal and state government power.
Basically education reformers believe that public
education would have a positive effect on the United States such as the one
constant for all forms of education reform includes the idea that small changes
in education will have large social returns in citizen health, wealth and
well-being. There may be a reduce cost to students and society since education
reformers desire to make public education into a market in the form of an
input-output system where accountability creates high-stakes from curriculum
standards tied to standardized tests.
