1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
poizon [28]
3 years ago
9

What is a difference between public policy and private policy?​

Social Studies
2 answers:
goldfiish [28.3K]3 years ago
5 0
<h2>The difference between public policy and private policy is Public policy is inefficient and the private policy is efficient.</h2>

Explanation:

Public policy is composed of constitutional laws and regulations of a country.  It is considered powerful when problem gets solved efficiently and effectively. It supports governmental institutions and policies, and encourages active citizenship.

The method of collecting, disclosing, and managing a client's data is termed as private policy. It manages legal requirement to protect privacy of a customer.

Anything that can be used to identify an individual is referred to personal information. It includes financial records, credit information, medical history and so on.

Sati [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:The difference between public policy and private policy is that private policy is not subject to Democrats processes. Public policy is created in the open with free debate and has the force of law (and not just company rules and regulations).

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Compare and contrast Machiavelli's ideas of virtue and morality in The Prince to Dante's presentation of virtue and moral good i
WARRIOR [948]

Machiavellian virtue this is a political virtue that responds to the appeal of the public world. More than a virtue, it is a virtuosity - it is the skill that, in Machiavelli's view, anyone who aspires to be a great political leader must have. Someone with the talent, creativity and willingness to respond to the call of his time and to rise to it.

They are similar theories, which resemble the form of morality and virtue and differ in the way one sees them.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the theories of totemism discussed in the text could help us understand the importance of mascots in american sports?
BlackZzzverrR [31]

The theories of totemism – a belief in which humans are said to have a rapport or mystical relationship with a spirit-being, such as a plant or an animal, is that mascots are characters or the symbols of the team or group that will celebrate team identity.
4 0
3 years ago
Why was sliver money one of charlemange’s most important reforms
Tpy6a [65]
It enabled people to purchase goods at lower prices. o It allowed people to use one standard to buy and sell goods. It gave the church an important role in international trade.
6 0
3 years ago
Why do julia and winston find it difficult to communicate?
Nuetrik [128]
Their relationship is forbidden. They are both members of a political party that is full of lies. Winston's job is to deliver good news to everyone despite the truth. There are telescreens around that may see their acts. It is an order by the government that promiscuity is not allowed between party members.
3 0
3 years ago
Guys please help.
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

D-He lived for some time after the Boston Massacre and spoke to his doctor about what he saw.

Explanation:

On the night of the shooting, he heard the sound of the bell on the street and decided to go outside. He knew that the trouble had something to do with the British – his neighbor persuaded him to leave behind a small cutlass before he headed to King Street. When the shooting erupted, he was wounded while crossing the street with his friend.

For Carr, shot through his abdomen, death was inevitable. He was carried to his master’s house and was tended by Doctor Jeffries. It took him four days to die, but he refused to lay the blame for his agonizing death upon the soldiers. According to the Doctor’s testimony during the trial, Carr told him that he thought that the soldiers would have fired long before. Were the soldiers greatly abused? Yes, they were. Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Yes. So they fired in self-defense? Yes, and he did not blame whoever hit him.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the Berlin Conference all about? What was the affect of it to?
    12·1 answer
  • According to the bill hammack the engineerguy light travels down a fiber optic cable by a process known as
    14·1 answer
  • Prior to entering a restaurant, amy starts to shake, hyperventilate, and feel light-headed. she is too terrified to enter the re
    15·1 answer
  • How did french philosopher rené descartes contribute to the scientific revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • What's the difference between stress and clinical depression?
    9·2 answers
  • Norman was visiting a tribal village in the Las Perlas islands. When it came time for sleep, he asked where his bed was and mimi
    6·1 answer
  • After the launches of Sputnik I and Sputnik II in 1957, efforts began in the United
    11·1 answer
  • Are there island in Himalayas
    12·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph to explain why these types of te
    5·1 answer
  • To give other drivers plenty of warning, place emergency flares or reflective triangles ___________behind your vehicle.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!