1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mnenie [13.5K]
3 years ago
13

Como evolucionaron las exportaciones de los países de América latina luego de 1929

History
1 answer:
natima [27]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:De 1929... Las exportation de los países de América Latina fueron disminuyendo, como preámbulo de la crisis económica de 1929. los recursos financieros se redujeron notoriamente y los inversionistas extranjeros se vieron obligados a retirar sus capitales y a cobrar las deudas

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did William Shakespeare change literature?
liberstina [14]

Answer:

He developed new types of poetry like liambic penimater

Explanation:

a-b a-b c-d c-d c-d and os on

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the significance of the expenditure on public health?
pogonyaev

Answer:

The significance of public health expenditure has always been of utmost importance. It shows how much health security a country has and how much the government cares about its citizens.

Spending on public health means healthier public which leads to decreased mortality rate. Infant deaths are decreased and a healthier public is tend to create a healthier and more prosperous economy as there will be more labor available.

I hope the answer is helpful.

5 0
3 years ago
BRUH I NEEEE HELP AGAinnnnnnnN!!!!!!!
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

May I ask, what is you question?

Explanation:

You have no question that can be answered.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did it make sense that many people believed John Adams wrote Common Sense?
kirill115 [55]
Because they have no common sense.
7 0
3 years ago
Which statement is most likely an interpretation of the Second Amendment?
alexandr1967 [171]
The Second Amendment to the Constitution of United States states:

"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. "

From the given options, the option D is the most likely interpretation of the second amendment i.e. There should be no limits on owning and using guns. The point highlighted in rest of the options is not listed anywhere in the amendment.

Therefore, the correct option is D.
<span>There should be no limits on owning and using guns.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which describes the opinion of most Americans as the Civil War started?
    5·1 answer
  • The Homestead Act of 1862 impacted American Indians by
    6·2 answers
  • Which Muslim leader reached a settlement over disputed lands during the Third Crusade?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the historical reason for americans choosing a bicameral system?
    8·1 answer
  • list and explain two legacies of the conflict in Vietnam. In what ways is the U.S. still feeling the effects the of Vietnam War?
    5·1 answer
  • Where was the battle of Quebec fought
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the Chinese government want to keep the events at Tiananmen Square a secret
    6·1 answer
  • Which leader was threatened by violence and fled from the South
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not one of the reasons that some thought the Constitution would need to be changed over time
    14·1 answer
  • How did businesses try to increase demand during the 1920s?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!