Answer:
The farmer. The second option.
Explanation:
Answer:
Incorrects:
Claim 1: When forests are cleared, we take away an opportunity to remove carbon from the atmosphere.
Claim 2: Carbon moves through biological systems and returns to the atmosphere through photosynthesis.
Claim 3: The amount of carbon involved in rapid cycling is much less than 1 percent of the total amount of carbon on Earth.
Explanation:
- The carbon contained in forest products makes a small and manageable contribution to the global carbon balance. Globally, the net effect on atmospheric concentration is negligible, unless the rate of decomposition in geographically displaced product stocks is different from that in the forest ecosystem from which it was removed. However, controlling these rates through proper management can lead to some degree of mitigation of increases in atmospheric CO2.
- During the carbon cycle, animals and plants release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere through cellular respiration, and plants capture carbon dioxide through photosynthesis.
- The amount of carbon involved in rapid cycling it is the largest since it includes the carbon exchange between living beings, and is intertwined with the carbon cycle through long-term geological processes
Answer:
This situation might happen depending on the ecosystem that it takes place in.
Explanation:
For example, in one ecosystem, where there are no serious predators trying to get the coyotes, they could be in a higher level because there is no immediate danger to them. However, in another ecosystem where there are predators trying to hunt them, they would be in a lower level because there, they are not at the top of the food web. Basically, it all depends on the ecosystem.
<em>Hope this helps!</em>
A dog and a tick would have a parasitic relationship. Seeing as how, if anything, the tick is harming the dog and the dog isn't getting anything in return, but the tick is getting both a food supply and a host, their relationship would be classified as parasitic.
