Answer: Simeon or Symeon
Explanation: Simon is one Latinised version of the name, the others being Simeon or Symeon. This practice carried over into English: in the king James version, the name Simeon Niger Is spelt Simeon (Acts 13:1) as is Simeon (Gospel of Luke) (Luke to 2:25) while Peter is called Simon (John 14:4)
False; stop sympathizing with Delmar and to withhold any sort of positive
reinforcement to his pain behaviors would make him bear the pain.
How positive reinforcement works?
Positive reinforcement in operant conditioning refers to the addition of a reinforcing stimulus after a behavior that increases the likelihood that the behavior will occur again in the future. An action's response or behavior will get stronger if a positive result, circumstance, or reward follows it. Here Delmar needs positive reinforcement for reduction in pain.
Positive reinforcement's impact on motivation is another factor contributing to its appeal as a teaching strategy. Positive reinforcement may provide you the boost in motivation you need to accomplish the goals you set, whether you are using it on your staff to reward good work or on yourself to work toward personal goals. Delmar should use positive reinforcement against his pain behaviour.
Learn more about positive reinforcement here:
brainly.com/question/15869859
#SPJ4
Only the Congress (which is in the legislative branch) can propose a
constitutional amendment, which must not only be approved by a large
majority in the Congress itself but must also be ratified, or approved,
by two-thirds of the states.
Since one of the powers of the
president (who is in the executive branch) is to suggest legislative
agendas, the president can technically also suggest a
constitutional amendment to the Congress. But in this case the
president's proposal is merely a suggestion and has no legislative
authority, since the real authority is with the Congress.
Answer: The legislative branch
Answer:
This chapter provides a historical framework for consideration of today’s debates over privatization. Changes in policies and practices are never free of the inertia of history. Some of the key pressures for change today have resulted from past action (or inaction), and today’s practices have evolved from specific problem-solving histories.
Efforts to provide safe drinking water and wastewater disposal facilities date back to the origins of civilization (Rosen, 1993; Winslow, 1952). Ancient societies in Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, Pakistan, Crete, and Greece all sought to provide safe drinking water and safe means of human waste disposal. Water supply and wastewater collection reached a high point in the Roman Empire. The Dark Ages, however, witnessed a decline in the development and application of these practices.
As world population neared one billion during the Industrial Revolution in the late nineteenth century, cities and villages became more crowded. Public health concerns dictated that new ways had to be found to provide safe water supplies as well as provide means for safe disposal of sanitary wastes. Growth in the numbers and in the size of cities and increasing use of water in residential, commercial, and industrial enterprises led to increasing provision of public systems for water supply and wastewater systems. Although some research suggests that private water companies emerged during the Renaissance (Walker, 1968), private entrepreneurs initiated the provision of water supply services on a large scale during the nineteenth century in both Europe and the United States. By contrast, provision of sewers, along with streets and drainage facilities,
Explanation:
