Answer:
$11,760
Explanation:
The sales less the variable cost gives the contribution margin. The contribution margin less the fixed cost gives the net operating income/profit.
Without the new offer
Profit = 5000($29 - $15) - $20,900
= $70,000 - $20,900
= $49,100
For the new order a variable selling cost of $2 per unit would be eliminated, the contribution of the order will be
= 1680($20 - $15 + $2)
= 1680 * $7
= $11,760
This is the differential effect on profit.
Answer:
Economic profit = $40
Explanation:
given data
producing = 20 units
selling = $10 per unit
total fixed costs = $100
average variable cost = $3
output = 20 units
to find out
economic profit of this corporation
solution
we get here revenue that is express as
revenue = 20 units × $10
revenue = $200
and
now we get variable cost is here as
variable cost = 20 units × $3
variable cost = $60
and
now we get here total cost that is express as
total cost = Fixed cost + Variable cost .............1
total cost = $100 + $60
total cost = $160
so now Economic profit will be
Economic profit = Revenue - Total cost ......................2
Economic profit = $200 - $160
Economic profit = $40
Explanation:
Debit Credit
Cash $84,000
Common stock $70,000
Paid-In Capital in Excess of Par Value $14,000
It's necessary to split the equity in two accounts because there is information about the par value
Promotion Expenses $49,000
Common Stock $3,500
Paid-In Capital in Excess of Par Value $45,500
It's necessary to split the equity in two accounts because there is information about the par value
Promotion Expensese $49,000
Common Stock $49,000
It's not necessary to split the equity in two accounts because there is no information about the par value
Cash $136,500
Preferred Stock $87,500
Paid-In Capital in Excess of Par Value $49,000
It's necessary to split the equity in two accounts because there is information about the par value
Answer:
3.1781
Explanation:
here you go. I hope thats correct.
Answer: D. The state law violates the principles of intergovernmental immunity as applied to the manager
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the manager's best defense against the imposition of the fine is that the state law violates the principles of intergovernmental immunity as applied to the manager.
We should note that unless Congress agrees to a particular regulation, the state doesn't have the power to regulate federal government activities and therefore cannot interfere with federal functions. Therefore, the regulation in this case isn't applicable to the manager.
