Answer:
Bob Wilson was startled when Oppenheimer called the Japanese <em>"those poor little people" </em>because he understood the painful sense of both sides.
Explanation:
In an interview with Frank Stasio, Mr. Bird reveals the incident when Oppenheimer talks about Japanese and calls them "those poor little people." Bob Wilson was startled by this statement of Oppenheimer because he was able to understand the painful sense of both sides. It was the time when Oppenheimer was instructing people where to bomb.
Textual evidence:
<em>"And she asks, `Who are you talking about?' and he says, `The people who the bomb is going to be used on, the people in Japan.' And this is the very week where he's also instructing the bombardiers exactly how to drop the bomb, at what height to achieve the most maximum destruction. So he understood, you know, in a painful sense, both sides, the necessity as he saw it at the time, and yet, the horrible human consequences of it."</em>
Answer:
The primary developmental task of this stage is generativity vs. stagnation
Explanation:
Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development has 8 different stages where generativity vs. stagnation represents the 7th stage. This stage goes from the 40's to the 60's and people start to look for something that they can do and that will outlast them, it is the time to try "to leave a mark in the world" and this gives deep meaning to their days. They live the confrontation between making the world something better and not finding how to do it.
The most reasonable one is to list all the supporting details from the story
Hope this helps!
"<span>But like a hawk encumber'd with his hood, Explaining Metaphysics to the nation-- I wish he would explain his Explanation.</span>" > criticizes the subject for confusing his audience
"…he really promised something great, If not intelligible, without Greek Contrived to talk about the Gods of late, Much as they might have been supposed to speak. " > criticizes the subject for his half baked knowledge
"He was a mighty poet—and A subtle-souled Psychologist; All things he seemed to understand Of old or new—of sea or land— But his own mind—which was a mist." > Criticizes the subject for having abundant knowledge of the world but low self-awareness
