We can infer the boys have more knowledge than Douglass and are willing to teach him.
Frederick Douglass was born in 1818. He was an abolitionist, a writer, and a social reformer whose autobiography "The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass" greatly influenced the abolitionist movement in 1845.
Douglass' story shows how white slave owners perpetuate slavery by keeping their slaves in ignorance. At the time Douglass wrote, many people believed that slavery was a natural state of being.
Hence, the correct answer is 'they have more education than Douglass and are willing to teach him.'
Learn more about Frederick Douglass on brainly.com/question/13896424
#SPJ4
Answer:
what's the argument supposed to be about
Explanation:
Explanation:
The first story, Rules of the Game by Amy Tan, has a first person point of view, but Tan also allows readers to view the daughter and mother at the same time. Just like other first person stories, the protagonist Waverly Jong is the narrator who tells us the story. As I read through the story, I am immersed into the story, which is one of the strengths of first person point of view. From the story,
It is very obvious. If the story was told using a different point of view, it will be changed drastically. For example, Waverly’s point of view represents the symbolism of “The art of invisible strength”, which means self control. If the story has a different point of view, the meaning of self control will become useless. And in the perspective of characterization, the point of view is also important. Since we see the story through Waverly’s eyes, we know what Waverly judges and thinks about the other characters, and what Waverly thinks about herself. She believes her accomplishment is based on her talent in chess, which leads to the climax rising action of Waverly running away. We see how Waverly was irritated by her mother, and again, if the story is not told by Waverly, we would not be able to understand that she did not mean to hurt her mother with the words of “Why do you have to use me to show off? If you want to show off, then why don’t you learn to play chess?” Or if the story is told in a third person point of view, like the old woman Waverly knocked into in the instance, we probably see a rude and unreasonable young girl who argues with her mother in the middle of a street.
Direct observation. This is because the anecdotal fallacy is a logical fallacy and says that isolated events are not adequate pieces of evidence. It must be a well-documented case to be evidence.
If Khalil scored low on the intuitive function, that means he must score high on the opposite trait, which would be the <u>sensing function.</u>
<u />
<u />
<h3>Intuition vs Sensing</h3>
Both intuition and sensing are functions based on Jungian theories concerning our personalities. Intuition and sensing refer to the way we learn, that is, to how we take in information from the world.
A person who scores high in intuition is someone who learns based on his own perceptions and impressions of the information obtained. A person who scores high in sensing learns from his five senses.
One way that such a difference often shows itself is on people's abilities with their hands. Normally, sensory people are better painters or sculptors, for example. However, we must keep in mind there are exceptions to all cases.
With the information above in mind, we can say Khalil scored high on sensing since he scored low on intuition.
Learn more about intuition here:
brainly.com/question/887641
