Answer:
Julie judges people both by their words and by their actions.
Explanation:
Parallelism refers to the use of sentence components that are grammatically identical or similar in structure, sound, meaning, or meter. It is considered to be one of the fundamental principles of grammar and rhetoric, adding symmetry, effectiveness, and balance to the text. Examples of parallelism can be found in literary works and everyday conversations alike. A well-known example of parallelism is the Latin saying translated as<em> I </em><u><em>came</em></u><em>, I </em><u><em>saw</em></u><em>, I </em><u><em>conquered</em></u><em>.</em> Here we have the repetition of the past simple tense.
Two sentences we were given are a good example of the presence and the lack of parallelism. There is no parallelism in <em>Julie judges people both by what they say and by their actions. </em>It would've been better had the sentence said <em>Julie judges people both </em><u><em>by what they say</em></u><em> and </em><u><em>by what they do</em></u><em>.</em> There we have identical structures. <em>Julie judges people both </em><u><em>by their words</em></u><em> and </em><u><em>by their actions</em></u> is a good example of parallelism.
Answer:
W.R Coe is a Professor of History and American studies and professor of poltical science at Stanford University.
Explanation:
Jack Racove was the 1997 winner of the Pulitzer prize for History and the 1998 Cox Book Prize for Original meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution.
The book is of an innocent man wrongly, but imprisoned and his brilliant strategy for revenge against the people who betrayed him. Sailor Edmond Dantes is a guileless and honest young man who has a very peaceful life and has plans to marry the beautiful Mercedes are sadly ruined and shattered.
Hope this helped :)
The answer to the question is A).