1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Art [367]
3 years ago
6

Under what circumstances did John Locke think it would be acceptable for the people to overthrow the government

History
1 answer:
blsea [12.9K]3 years ago
6 0
Locke thought it would be acceptable for the people to overthrow the government when the government isn’t protecting the basic rights of the people (i.e. freedom of speech and religion) and protecting their property (ex. land and housing) because those are the reasons why the people created the government anyway so if the government isn’t doing its job then the people are validated in overthrowing the government.
You might be interested in
4. Which principle of democratic government means that the people themselves have the right to choose what kind
Mumz [18]

Answer:

D.Bill of Rights

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which answer choice shows the events of world war two in the correct chronological order?
professor190 [17]

C IS THE ANSWER I HOPE I HELPED YOU HON

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Puritans view war?
Ganezh [65]

Answer: Puritans' efforts contributed to both civil war in England and the founding of ... The moral and religious earnestness that was characteristic of Puritans was ... Book of Martyrs—which provided justification to English Protestants to view England.

5 0
2 years ago
Leading up to the french and indian war, the british were
stellarik [79]

During the French and Indian War, <u>the british were allies of the side of the British indians. </u>

The French and Indian War (1754–1763) was a confrontation between the British colonies and the colony of New France in North America. During the conflict, each side was supported by military forces from its parent country and by American Indian-native allies. The French were outnumbered (60,000 settlers against 2 million inhabitants in the British colonies), and had to rely more on the Indians.

It was a singular conflict. Even tough the European powers participated somehow, it is not regarded in America as a conflict associated to them at all.

4 0
3 years ago
What reason was given for the 2003 US invasion of Iraq
GuDViN [60]

Answer:

<em>The correct option between all the options that are given is </em><em>option B</em><em> which tells about mass destruction’s weapon’s involvement. </em>

Explanation:

It was noted by US and UK that then Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was prepared for Weapons of mass destruction and although Iraqi were given serious chances to disarm and comply with all obligations.

The weapons they had was no improvement in the situation which led to Iraq facing the consequences.  

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The supreme court decision to overturn granger laws in wabash v. illinois (1886) led to
    7·1 answer
  • Under the feudal system, how were soldiers and samurai rewarded?
    8·2 answers
  • What makes rome more than just a city
    6·1 answer
  • The Great Plains was also called the "Great American Acres" *<br><br> True<br> False
    13·2 answers
  • Why did english settlers settle in the southern colonies
    11·1 answer
  • How did Henry Ford affect American industry?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the effect of Abraham Lincoln winning the election of 1860?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the Reformation impact European society?
    11·2 answers
  • 9. Who was the only US soldier to die in the Cuban Missile Crisis ? How did he die?
    13·1 answer
  • Levels of analysis on war
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!