All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following statements is correct?

Business

1 answer:

AysviL [449]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

In state welfare capitalism, the government plays an active role in regulating economic activities in an effort to smooth out the boom-and-bust pattern of the business cycle

Explanation:

Nations that adhere to capitalism on the premise of social welfare are characterized by state regulation aimed at protecting the population and ensuring a healthy standard of living. This is especially relevant because it protects citizens from economic instability. Typically, countries where social welfare works, many jobs are public, and the state has several social programs. Examples are Sweden, Norway and Denmark.

You might be interested in

The break-even in units sold will decrease if there is an increase in: a. unit sales volume. b. total fixed expenses. c. unit va

s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

d. Selling Price

Explanation:

Break even point is calculated as $\frac{Fixed\ cost}{Contribution\ per\ unit}$

Thus, break even point in units only in two cases,

Fixed cost is reduced that is decreased,
Contribution per unit is increased.

Now, here the options are

a. Increase in units sales volume is of no relevance as will not impact the fixed cost or contribution per unit.

b. Increase in fixed cost will result in higher break even point, as numerator in the fraction will increase.

c. Increase in unit variable cost will ultimately decrease the contribution thus, it is of no relevance.

d. Increase in selling price will increase the contribution per unit, that is the increase in denominator value in fraction, thus, break even units will decrease.

Correct option is

d. Selling Price

7 0

3 years ago

The better-off test for evaluating whether a particular diversification move is likely to generate added value for shareholders

Arada [10]

Answer: Has competitively valuable value chain match-ups with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart.

Explanation:

The better-off test of diversification is that the company must gain a return that is higher than incremental growth. Incremental growth is usually defined a 1 + 1 = 2 formula and this test argues that Diversification must provide more than this such that the company achieves synergistic growth ( 1 + 1 = 3) which is what happens when different entities work better together than alone.

Diversification should therefore be into an area that will be able to match-up with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart and produce even greater returns.

5 0

3 years ago

What is the maximum amount a 45-year-old taxpayer and 45-year-old spouse can put into a Traditional or Roth IRA for 2016 (assumi

tangare [24]

Answer:

$5,500 USD

Explanation:

Since traditional Roth IRA accounts cannot be owned jointly, then both individuals must have their own account. That being said they can still contribute to each other's Roth IRA accounts on behalf of their spouse. You can contribute a total of 100% of your earned income up to a limit of $5,500 USD. Pensions are not allowed as contributions. Individual's over the age of 50 have a limit of $6,500

6 0

3 years ago

True Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Trumaine Corporation, generated a $400,000 taxable loss in its first year of oper

Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

a. The overall state income tax for the unitary group is $60,474

b. The aggregate state income tax for the entities if they were non-unitary is $110,000

c. The aggregate state income tax for the entities if they were non-unitary-overall state income tax for the unitary group is $49,253

Explanation:

a. In order to calculate the overall state income tax for the unitary group we would have to make the following calculation:

overall state income tax for the unitary group=state A income tax+ state B income tax

state A income tax=state taxable income*tax rate

state taxable income=$600,000*30.7%

state taxable income=$184,200

tax rate=8%

Therefore, state A income tax=$184,200*8%

state A income tax=$14,736

state B income tax=state taxable income*tax rate

state taxable income=$600,000*69.3%

state taxable income=$415,800

tax rate=11%

Therefore, state B income tax=$415,800*11%

state A income tax=$45,738

Therefore, overall state income tax for the unitary group=$14,736+$45,738

overall state income tax for the unitary group=$60,474

The overall state income tax for the unitary group is $60,474

b. In order to calculate the aggregate state income tax for the entities if they were non-unitary we would have to make the following calculation:

aggregate state income tax for the entities if they were non-unitary=aggregate state income tax state A+aggregate state income tax state B

aggregate state income tax state A=0

aggregate state income tax state B=$1,000,000*11%

aggregate state income tax state B=$110,000

Therefore, aggregate state income tax for the entities if they were non-unitary=0+$110,000

aggregate state income tax for the entities if they were non-unitary=$110,000

The aggregate state income tax for the entities if they were non-unitary is $110,000

c. The aggregate state income tax for the entities if they were non-unitary-overall state income tax for the unitary group=$110,000-$60,474

The aggregate state income tax for the entities if they were non-unitary-overall state income tax for the unitary group=$49,253

3 0

3 years ago

The 2019 balance sheet of Dyrdek’s Skate Shop, Inc., showed $530,000 in the common stock account and $2.3 million in the additio

Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

$80,000

Explanation:

$The \ expression \ for \ calculating \ cash \ flow \ to \ stockholders \ is:$

$Cashflow \ = \ Dividend \ paid \ during \ the \ year \ - \ change \ in \ t he \ value \ of \ common \ stock \ during \ - \ change \ in \ value \ of \ stock \ in \ the \ previous \ year$ $Here;$

$Change \ in \ value \ of \ Common \ stock \ during \ the \ year \ =$ $\ Value \ of \ Common \ stock \ of \ the \ Curren t \ Year - Value\ of \ Common \ stock \ of \ the \ Previous \ Year$

$Change \ in \ valu e \ of \ Additional \ paid \ in \ surplus \ account \ during \ the \ year =$

$Value \ of \ Additional \ paid \ in \ surplus \ account \ o f \ the \ Current \ Year \ -$ $\ Value \ of \ Additional \ paid \ in \ surplus \ account \ of \ th e \ Previous \ Year$