The dust bowl was a sever drought caused by fluctuations in ocean temperatures. Other factors that contributed to the affect it had on the Midwest was the dry climate and their use of poor farming techniques.
Slaves were used in the North for different purpose. In the North, slave labor helped to provide the food necessary to feed the Union army is a false statement.
<h2>Slavery in the North</h2>
In the north, plantation slavery were used in each colony, where they cultivate staple crop colonists chose to cultivate.
In the war, African Americans were used for military purposes. in the South, they were used as enslaved labor and in the north, they were used as wage labor and military volunteers.
The North did not support slavery in full
. They oppose slavery was based on political and anti-south sentiment, economic factors, etc.
Learn more about slaves from
brainly.com/question/9374853
Answer:
Hey mate......
Explanation:
This is ur answer......
<em>a. (I don't know)</em>
<em>b. Humayun</em>
<em>c. Akbar</em>
<em>d. Humayun (repeated)</em>
<em>e. Jahangir </em>
<em>f</em><em>. Aurangzeb</em>
<em>g. Bahadur Shah </em>
Hope it helps!
Mark me brainliest pls.....
Follow me! :)
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
Answer:
The New Deal was a series of programs, public work projects, financial reforms, and regulations enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States between 1933 and 1939
