1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexus [3.1K]
4 years ago
7

All of these are arguments that supported the position of which of these people?

History
2 answers:
Karolina [17]4 years ago
6 0
The answer is B. Loyalists wanted the British to remain in control of the colonies.
never [62]4 years ago
4 0
The answer is loyalists, they were the ones who remained loyal to the British.
You might be interested in
What if the south had insisted that Samuel
xeze [42]

Answer:

There would have been anarchy had it been that Samuel Tilden won the election and refused to compromise.

Explanation:

This is because, the Federal troops at the Southern States carrying out Reconstruction policy would have been removed and the disenfranchisement of black voters and African Americans would have been extended to other States in America.

This would have gone a long way to remove the gains of Abraham Lincoln who tried to unite the country after the Civil War.

6 0
3 years ago
Why were the colonists upset with the British during 1760s?
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

The main reason the colonists were angry was because Britain had rejected the idea of 'no taxation without representation'. Almost no colonist wanted to be independent of Britain at that time. Yet all of them valued their rights as British citizens and the idea of local self-rule. They considered the Stamp Act to be the worst in a series of violations of these rights.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What was theodore roosevelt's most significant contribution to the conservation movement as president?
worty [1.4K]
The answer is C. <span>protecting large areas of federal land as national refuges, parks, and forests</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What rights were given to the states of the holy roman empire in the treaty?(need ASAP)
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

The Peace of Westphalia recognized the full territorial sovereignty of the member states of the empire.

Explanation:

because They were empowered to contract treaties with one another and with foreign powers, provided that the emperor and the empire suffered no prejudice.

hope that helps!!!

8 0
3 years ago
This is due today and I need help. Please! Just answer question in a paragraph based off text.
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

Article 2, 11, and 14 I think they all sum up to things that women had to fight for.

Explanation:

you can ask me a follow up about the question if you need it

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • why did the united states object to the soviet union controlling poland, czechoslovakia, hungary, romania, and bulgaria as satel
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following best summarizes the goal of the Constitutional Convention?
    6·2 answers
  • What best describes the significance of father gapon's march on bloody sunday?
    10·2 answers
  • Identify the type of source based on the information provided.
    9·1 answer
  • Who did President Bush order to clean up after the Exxon Valdez incident?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the annexation of Bosnia and herzegovina in 1908 intensify the rivalry between Austria-Hungary and Serbia
    13·1 answer
  • How do most of the people of africa live
    7·2 answers
  • Counting money is an example of a national power ?
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement about the Election of 2000 is FALSE?
    10·2 answers
  • Immigrants to the United States have done very little to strengthen the country by their skills and knowledge.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!