When The Jungle was revealed, the country reacted horrified. President Theodore Roosevelt requested an immediate probe into the meat industry after reading the book.
<h3 /><h3>What two things did
President Theodore Roosevelt do after reading The Jungle?</h3>
President Roosevelt asked Sinclair to the White House to talk The Jungle after viewing it. The president then ordered a special group to look into the slaughterhouses in Chicago.
In May 1906, the special tribunal released its report. Nearly all of Sinclair's statements of atrocities were validated by the study.
Thus, When The Jungle was revealed, the country reacted horrified
For more details about President Theodore Roosevelt do after reading The Jungle, click here:
brainly.com/question/7067005
#SPJ1
Answer:What was an effect of having so many men away from home during World War II? It permanently changed the role of women in the workforce. It opened up opportunities for minorities and women.
Explanation:
Answer:
To meet demand for food for fighting troops
Explanation:
by planting more and increasing the production of livestock
Answer:
<h2>A. Rights of life, liberty and property</h2>
Explanation:
The Scientific Revolution had shown that there are natural laws in place in the physical world and in the universe at large. John Locke and other enlightment thinkers believed that there were natural laws that applied to society and government also. This included a conviction that all human beings have certain natural rights which are to be protected and preserved. Locke's ideal was one that promoted individual freedom and equal rights and opportunity for all. Each individual's well-being (life, health, liberty, possessions) should be served by the way government and society are arranged.
In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government</em> (1690), Locke expressed his views about natural laws / natural rights in this way:
- <em>The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions… (and) when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he, as much as he can, to preserve the rest of mankind, and may not, unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away, or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.</em>
