1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
diamong [38]
4 years ago
5

Bacon's rebellion resulted from nathaniel bacon's discontent with what

History
1 answer:
Arturiano [62]4 years ago
4 0
<span>settlers on the frontier</span>
You might be interested in
Use joseph stalin in a sentence
Mkey [24]
Joseph Stalin was the leader of the Soviet Union in the 1920s.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who founded the National Grange?
frez [133]
<span>The question is 'who founded the national grange. The national grange was founded by Oliver Hudson Kelley in 1867. It was formed as a national organisation. Its sole purpose was to encourage families to bound together to promote the political well being and agricultural practices in the community. It is the oldest American agricultural advocacy group with a national focus.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Commission engaged in a regular dialogue with the Government of Sudan throughout its mandate, in particular through meetings
Lilit [14]

The correct answers are B and E.

B.<em> </em><em>It provides evidence to support its conclusion.</em>

The Commission held regular meetings with the Government of Sudan in Geneva and Sudan. It also did a throughout investigation on the events succeeding there and analyzed the received information. The conclusion reached was that the Government of Sudan and the Janjaweed ( a militia that operates in Sudan, literally 'a man with a gun on a horse) are responsible for indiscriminate attacks, including killing of civilians, torture, enforced disappearances and many more. The Sudanese government denied those charges but the Commission's findings were based on an investigative report and therefor reliable.

E<em>. It was written for and released by a respected international organization.</em>

This report was written by the <em>Commission on Human Rights in South</em> <em>Sudan</em> which was created by the United Nations Human Rights Council.

The Commission's purpose was to determine, collect and present evidence for alleged gross violations and abuses on human rights and related crimes, including violence and ethnic violence in Sudan.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What Do We Call The System created to even Out The Power Between all Three branches
Ivenika [448]
The System is Checks and Balances
4 0
3 years ago
Does the Constitution allow a President to ignore a Supreme Court decision? Explain
IgorC [24]

Answer:Our topic is whether President Trump, or any chief executive for that matter, can defy the U.S. Supreme Court. The beginning of the inquiry starts with the portrait of Andrew Jackson, our seventh president, which hangs famously or notoriously (depending on one’s political predilection) above Trump’s desk in the Oval Office. In the Supreme Case, Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the High Court sided with Native Americans and ruled against white settlers who sought to remove them from their land. President Jackson steadfastly refused to enforce the ruling informing the Court, “Chief Justice John Marshall has made his ruling, now let him enforce it.” Marshall did not take Jackson up on his offer and the order was never enforced.

Fast forward to the administration of Abraham Lincoln and his decision to suspend the writ of habeas corpus, a critical civil liberty protected by the Constitution. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger Taney, ruled that only Congress, not the President, could take such constitutional action. Notwithstanding Taney’s abhorrent racist decision in Dred Scott, he was right on the law in this instance. Lincoln refused to enforce the Supreme Court order and was never challenged.

The above examples provide a precedential basis for President Trump to disobey an order from the Supreme Court, although Professor Loewy will adamantly disagree (no spoiler warning required). However, my view on this subject goes far deeper. There is no provision in the Constitution which expressly grants the U.S. Supreme Court the right to invalidate state or federal laws on the basis of constitutionality. In fact, the Federalist Papers, the definitive and singular source of the legislative intent behind the Constitution, makes clear that such power of review was never accorded. I will refer our readers to the writing of Alexander Hamilton who stated in Federalist Paper no. LXXXI that the Supreme Court was not granted such broad powers given the concern that it might exercise “Monarchical” authority contrary to the operation of a republican form of government. Said Hamilton, “In the first place, there is not a syllable in the plan (the Constitution) under consideration which directly empowers the national courts to construe the laws according to the spirit of the Constitution.”

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which trade route did Mr. Parkhurst say was the MOST IMPORTANT of the routes we learned? Question 2 options:
    5·1 answer
  • Is this a scientific model? Use complete sentences to explain why or why not.
    5·2 answers
  • “After World War I, which of these did not happen?”
    11·1 answer
  • How was the colosseum paid for
    7·2 answers
  • President Lyndon B. Johnson's use of United States forces to fight in the
    8·1 answer
  • Can you help me please
    11·1 answer
  • How did Roz keep the animals alive during the winter? ( wild robot ?
    13·1 answer
  • With what in the Western Hemisphere did
    8·2 answers
  • What are the reasons for the growth of terrorist groups such as al Qaeda over the past two decades?
    15·1 answer
  • 2 Plains Indians hunted buffalo for centuries without damaging their population. How did their relationship with buffalo differ
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!