King had a non-violence movement. They did things like sit in, practiced civil disobedience, and etc. When the police arrested them or acted violently towards them they would resist or fight back. This movement was successful.
The Black Power movement deals with violence. they thought that Kings way of getting rights was not helping so they took matter in their own hands and did things violently. This is why their movement wasn't successful.
I think <span>Ayatollah Khamenei was the next leader??? You don't specify who the Shah was or when they were overthrown.</span>
Lincoln hoped to use a well-known figure of speech to help rouse the people to recognition of the magnitude of the ongoing debates over the legality of slavery. His use of this paraphrased metaphor is perhaps clearer when you look at some more of his speech:
"A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe the government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new — North as well as South.
As you can see, in this metaphor, the "house" refers to the Union — to the United States of America — and that house was divided between the opponents and advocates of slavery. Lincoln felt that the ideals of freedom for all and the institution of slavery could not coexist — morally, socially, or legally — under one nation. Slavery must ultimately be universally accepted or universally denied.
Answer: B and D,
Explanation: The Allies did not invade Japan and Germany in 1943, the Red Army is the soviet union and they were on the allies side
<span>D. He overturned a treaty that was signed unfairly.--this treaty was for Creek lands in Georgia.
John Q Adams believed Native Americans needed to be paid fairly for their land and the US could not just take land away from Native Americans. He did want to remove tribes however so the US could access the resources on the land. </span>