This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
- On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
- On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Happy 2019! :)
the answer is D. because none of the other things happened for about 100 years
The American Indian Wars were battles between American settlers and western Indians. Indians were also a key factor in the imperial rivalries among France, Spain, and England.But eighteenth-century conflicts were not limited to the European wars for empire. In Virginia and the Carolina, English-speaking colonists pushed aside many Indian tribes. When the Treaty of Paris was established it created conflict between whites and tribes. The Indians in the US were seen as a total waste of space.
Answer:3 days
Explanation: from july 1st to july 3rd
