1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jobisdone [24]
3 years ago
6

what message might these frequent and violent changes in leadership have sent to people of the roman empire

History
1 answer:
san4es73 [151]3 years ago
6 0
If you're talking about frequent and violent changes in leadership of the Roman empire, then a good anwer would be that the people were being signalled that not everything is at it should be at the highest eschelons of their nation. Furthermore, it was a cause for concern as it signaled possible instabillities in their civilization as well. 
You might be interested in
When it takes more and more money to buy the same amount of goods; a continuous rise in the prices of goods or services is calle
katrin2010 [14]
I’m pretty sure it’s D, inflation
3 0
3 years ago
Why did women have so few rights during the antebellum period?
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:n the era of revivalism and reform, American understood the family and home as the hearthstones of civic virtue and moral influence. This increasingly confined middle-class white women to the domestic sphere, where they were responsible for educating children and maintaining household virtue. Yet women took the very ideology that defined their place in the home and managed to use it to fashion a public role for themselves. As a result, women actually became more visible and active in the public sphere than ever before. The influence of the Second Great Awakening, coupled with new educational opportunities available to girls and young women, enabled white middle-class women to leave their homes en masse, joining and forming societies dedicated to everything from literary interests to the antislavery movement.

In the early nineteenth century, the dominant understanding of gender claimed that women were the guardians of virtue and the spiritual heads of the home. Women were expected to be pious, pure, submissive, and domestic, and to pass these virtues on to their children. Historians have described these expectations as the “Cult of Domesticity,” or the “Cult of True Womanhood,” and they developed in tandem with industrialization, the market revolution, and the Second Great Awakening. In the early nineteenth century, men’s working lives increasingly took them out of the home and into the “public sphere.” At the same time, revivalism emphasized women’s unique potential and obligation to cultivate Christian values and spirituality in the “domestic sphere.” There were also real legal limits to what women could do outside of it. Women were unable to vote, men gained legal control over their wives’ property, and women with children had no legal rights over their offspring. Additionally, women could not initiate divorce, make wills, or sign contracts. Women effectively held the legal status of children.

Because the evangelical movement prominently positioned women as the guardians of moral virtue, however, many middle-class women parlayed this spiritual obligation into a more public role. Although prohibited from participating in formal politics such as voting, office holding, and making the laws that governed them, white women entered the public arena through their activism in charitable and reform organizations. Benevolent organizations dedicated to evangelizing among the poor, encouraging temperance, and curbing immorality were all considered pertinent to women’s traditional focus on family, education, and religion. Voluntary work related to labor laws, prison reform, and antislavery applied women’s roles as guardians of moral virtue to address all forms of social issues that they felt contributed to the moral decline of society. As antebellum reform and revivalism brought women into the public sphere more than ever before, women and their male allies became more attentive to the myriad forms of gender inequity in the United States.

5 0
3 years ago
What three factors led to the rise of terrorism?
nata0808 [166]

Explanation:

The palestin-israel conflict

the collapse of the soviet empire

political instability in the middle east

8 0
3 years ago
Why did France and Britain appease the fascist powers?
liberstina [14]

Answer:

Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain's policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. ... Chamberlain - and the British people - were desperate to avoid the slaughter of another world war.

5 0
3 years ago
How is folk dancing an expression of Texas culture?
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

All the dances have roots in traditional Spanish boleros.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Cities have __
    8·1 answer
  • How did Hurricane Katrina lead to renewed concerns over civil rights in the United States?
    8·1 answer
  • The teachings of laozi are the basis of
    7·1 answer
  • Why were the British heading to Lexington and Concord? A a new camp was being made to house the British army B they were retreat
    8·1 answer
  • The leader of the nonviolent resistance to british colonial rule in india, whose ideas had a great influence on martin luther ki
    5·1 answer
  • What was the purpose to Declare independence
    15·2 answers
  • Please help asap i really need help
    15·2 answers
  • Select all the correct answers.
    13·1 answer
  • Trick or treating likely evolved from which medieval custom?
    15·2 answers
  • What methods were used by the Ottomans to defeat Constantinople?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!