The best answer for this question is A. This is because this court decision allowed the US government to place Japanese Americans into internment camps during WWII, and therfore taking away their rights, even if they were American citizens.
The buffalo soldiers were expected to be the weaker lot - not as good as the white soldiers, most people who were in the army did not have much hope for them.They did not get as good quality guns,they had old uniform given out to them and got second priority after the white soldiers-I.e if there wasn't enough tents for both lots the white soldiers would come first so they would get the tents while the buffalo soldiers would have to sleep on the ground.Racial Abuse was experienced continuously, at the start of the buffalo soldiers time , slavery had just been abolished so it was difficult for black soldiers to be seen equal and free to the white soldiers who were used to treating them horribly, and saw the black soldiers as unable and useless.The black and white soldiers were also segregated into separate lots.
Now that is not the case, racism is not tolerated even though unfortunately it still happens in some cases.
Answer: The answer is D.
Explanation: They had more opportunities in the United States-especially in the 1800s-mid 1900s, immigrants would immigrate to the United States for better opportunities, because their home country could’ve been in a waging war, in a famine, etc.
The Constitution says that an amendment that may be proposed, either by the congress with a 2/3 of the majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called by 2/3 of the state legislatures
hope this helps! <3
Answer: C. Writ of certiorari
Explanation:
Basically, it is a type of writ that is rarely used by which an appellate court decides to review a case at its discretion. It also orders a lower court to deliver its record in a case so that the higher court may review it.