Answer:
irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]
Explanation:
The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.
All of the above :)) hope this helped
Answer:
Reformers wanted to make Native Americans like whites—to “Americanize” them. The Dawes Act, passed in 1887, was intended to encourage Native Americans to give up their traditional ways and become farmers. The act divided reservations into individual plots of land for each family.
Answer: There are several reasons that led Iraq to invade Kuwait.Some of the reasons are given below.
1.Iraq claimed that Kuwait was stealing their petroleum by slant drilling. So that was a big reason to Iraq.
2. Again Iraq had to pay huge debt to Kuwait which was taken at the time of Iraq-Iran war. But Saddam Hussein didn't want to pay this.
3.Moreover, the production of petroleum in Kuwait was high. As a result Iraq started to loose their market. So the revenue fall down in Iraq.
All these reasons led Saddam Hussein to invade Kuwait.
Explanation:
